By Jon Cassidy | Watchdog.org
AUSTIN — The University of Texas Board of Regents threw support to embattled regent Wallace Hall at its meetings this week, approving two measures to reform problems that Hall has spotlighted.
Regents voted for new policies on the relationship between universities and their affiliated foundations, and also approved an audit into how officials respond to public information requests.
Hall is synonymous with both issues. He pointed out financial shenanigans at the University of Texas Law School Foundation, and pressed the University of Texas at Austin for public records by the box load.
For his troubles, UTA President Bill Powers’ allies in the Legislature have initiated impeachment proceedings against Hall.
But the regents don’t appear inclined to allow their executive authority to be usurped by a small band of legislators. A board majority that already tilted toward Hall got stronger this week with three new regents taking their seats, and Chancellor Francisco Cigarroa is challenging the insolence of officials at the UTA who have been refusing to turn over documents to regents.
On Wednesday, Cigarroa recommended “a targeted compliance review” of how officials at at UTA and elsewhere handle requests under the Texas Public Information Act.
The review comes after Kevin Hegarty, a UTA vice-president, said earlier this month that UTA would defy document requests from their lawful overseers in the chancellor’s office and on the board of regents on the grounds that a House committee with no executive authority might also be interested in some of the records. The House committee had sent Hegarty sent a letter and called it a Document Preservation Notice, apparently even using capital letters.
With the condescension of a librarian addressing a sticky-fingered schoolboy, Hegarty told his superiors that files he’d gotten back from the regents “seem to have been tossed back into the boxes at random,”which would hinder him from making any official proclamations of orderliness the House committee might want.
UT systemwide compliance officer Larry Plutko will lead the audit and prepare his findings by Oct. 31. Among his tasks will be examining “processes on notifying the correct executive officers and employees to provide responsive documents.” That sounds dull enough, but it means seeing whether officials are searching through email databases for all responsive documents, or just asking the subjects of investigations whether they have anything relevant.
A task force chaired by Brenda Pejovich produced a list of recommendations on policies defining the relationship of universities to their affiliated foundations. In short, the foundations need to be established as either part of a school, or as independent.
The task force recommended signing memoranda of understanding with clear definitions for each foundation and establishing transparency and conflict-of-interest policies.
The financial dealings of the foundations, in particular the University of Texas Law School Foundation, have been a subject of controversy since late 2011, when Larry Sager, dean of the law school, was asked to resign after it was discovered he had received a $500,000 forgivable loan from the foundation.
The forgivable loan program was not widely known, but Sager has insisted it wasn’t secret.
Contact Jon Cassidy at [email protected] or @jpcassidy000.
- Texas’ Rep. Pitts announces retirement after improper influence story
- University of Texas regents show support for Wallace Hall
- Case against UT regent Wallace Hall is a sham — here’s proof
- Texas senator got $477k for supposed ‘cameo’ appearance in Wallace Hall lawsuit
- Lawmaker admits pulling strings on UT admissions
- Trustee accused of crime for rejecting dodgy accounting
- Longhorns: Senator used clout in UT law school admissions
- Children of Texas lawmakers get into UT School of Law, but struggle to pass bar exam
- Chancellor is probing favoritism in UT admissions
- UT report: Charge against Hall is legally ‘absurd’
- Attorney in UT case hides six-figure charges despite terms of contract
- University of Texas clout scandal grows as new e-mails surface
- Four more get into UT Law despite low LSATs
- Reports on UT favoritism, impeachment expected soon
- Attorney: Secret tape covered up by lawmakers proves regent’s innocence
- Dozens of UT Law’s least qualified students are connected politically
- University of Texas uncovers admissions corruption, halts investigation
- UT admissions: Straus, Branch, Pitts pulled strings
- Who got the 128? UT Law admits students with bad LSAT scores
- Patrick’s win may doom Hall impeachment effort
- Chancellor promises complete investigation of UT admissions
- Board to decide UT president’s fate Thursday
- Texas politicians smarten up, ditch UT pres this time around
- Tribune story may have doomed UT’s Powers
- Academics condone the privilege they denounce
- Three essential stories on the UT admissions scandal
- Texas AG Greg Abbott embraces Roe v. Wade
- Roe v. Wade is AG’s new pretext for blocking Texas law school investigation
- Two UT regents pressed for records destruction
- New crime invented for Hall: assisted guesswork
- Texas lawmaker failed to disclose his own clout letter in UT flap
- Texas legislator Fischer insists on role in UT investigation
- Hutchison pulled strings for friends’ kids and grandkids at UT
- Ex-UT Law dean’s credit card bill: $400k in four years
- Abbott’s UT picks are pro-affirmative action
- Report: University of Texas showed favoritism to thousands
- Kroll ignored hundreds of weak UT applications
- Billionaire defends UT admissions privileges for ‘leaders’
- Weak admissions to University of Texas Law increased after Sager’s ouster
- Kroll report takes dig at Watchdog.org
- Hicks won’t stop UT’s backdoor admits
- Texas governor’s wife was on UT nominee’s payroll
- Bill to limit UT oversight clears committee
- UT regent blasts speaker for ‘abuse of office’
- Texas politician rebuts himself with apparently plagiarized letter
- Pay-to-play scandal involves UT dean, Texas Exes
- Supreme Court asked to look at UT’s backdoor admissions program
- Lawmakers want UT applications shielded from scrutiny
- McRaven makes UT scandal his own
- An open letter to Attorney General Ken Paxton on the UT cover-up
- Chancellor Bill McRaven’s UT cover-up has no defenders
- UT’s back door still open, but can’t stay secret, AG rules
- Whitewash: Kroll left dozens of bad LSATs out of UT report
- McRaven’s defense to Hall lawsuit refuted by own words
- Ready for the end of affirmative action?
- UT admissions scandal is 10 times bigger than official report
- McRaven trolls Dallas Morning News
- Powers to get top salary at UT Law
- UT sues to block Watchdog access to admissions investigation
- UT approves ‘Spinal Tap’ policy for backdoor admissions
- Admissions survey: No, UT, everybody doesn’t do it
- UT admissions scandal prompts new investigation
- Ticket scandal a black mark for UT, DA
- Showdown over UT cover-up nears end
- McRaven’s rationale for UT cover-up denounced by regents, AG
- High court to decide if University of Texas can deep-six investigation
- High court hears arguments on whether UT can bury investigation
- Testimony by UT contradicts story fed high court
- These ‘horns ain’t loyal, McRaven finds
- UT’s Hall challenges Abbott over board picks
- Texas Supreme Court nullifies rule of law; impunity to reign
- The battle for the Kroll records goes on