By Mary C. Tillotson | Watchdog.org.
Parents shouldn’t have a voice in the lawsuit against Louisiana’s school voucher program, the U.S. Department of Justice argues in a motion filed Oct. 22.
In August, the DOJ filed a motion in a 40-year-old court case dormant since the 1970s, arguing the voucher program impedes the schools’ desegregation process. In fact, some of the state’s schools are still under decades-old court orders to desegregate.
The Goldwater Institute this fall intervened on behalf of the hundreds of parents whose children left the failing public schools for better alternatives. Later, after a media outcry, the DOJ backpedaled, saying it just wanted to make sure all of the information was processed correctly. The parents’ intervention is inappropriate, the DOJ motion argues.
Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal lashed out.
“The Obama Administration is attempting to tell parents to sit down and shut up. It’s never going to happen. Despite whatever evolving legal argument the Obama Administration comes up with, the voices of thousands of parents will not be silenced,” he said in a statement.
Jindal has spoken out for parents’ rights throughout the controversy, even recording a television ad with the message “Louisiana parents know best.”
The motion drew criticism from the Goldwater Institute and the Black Alliance for Educational Options. More than 90 percent of voucher participants are minorities. If the DOJ’s case is successful, many could lose their vouchers and be forced to return to failing schools.
Louisiana’s voucher program is limited to low-income families residing in average-to-failing school districts, according to the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice.
“DOJ has wrongly decided to not only sue the state of Louisiana to stop the state scholarship program in 34 parishes but they want to also silence the voices of parents who are standing up for their children’s education by intervening in the lawsuit,” said Kenneth Campbell, president of BAEO, in a statement. “Denying the voice and choice of parents is immoral, and DOJ should be ashamed.”
The DOJ claims it has the families’ interests covered, and that their intervention reveals a misunderstanding about the case – the department is not trying to stop the program, it claims.
“(Families) are simply mistaken that the current proceedings implicate the interest they assert, and their motion rests on a fundamental misapprehension about the relief sought by the United States,” according to the motion.
But the DOJ hasn’t withdrawn its original motion trying to block the voucher program, the Goldwater Institute noted in a release.
“The Justice Department is attempting to block the courthouse door to school choice families. Their argument is essentially bait-and-switch, saying that they have no intention of harming the program, while at the same time insisting that it must comply with desegregation decrees,” said Clint Bolick, vice president for litigation at the Goldwater Institute, in an email to Watchdog.
Bolick did not say whether the most recent motion would succeed.
“Certainly the opposition is not unexpected and prospects for intervention are uncertain,” he said, “but deciding this case without the families being involved would be perverse, because the entire point of desegregation cases is about ensuring educational opportunities.”
The desegregation court orders from decades ago were intended to help minority students, and even if vouchers do slow that process – a weak case, according to Richard Komer, senior attorney for the Institute for Justice – the DOJ’s actions are hurting minority students by barring them from decent schools. Furthermore, research has shown that voucher programs decrease racial segregation.
Contact Mary C. Tillotson at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Arizona mom won’t give up on special needs kids, no matter what state says
- Reviving a 1970s lawsuit, DOJ would keep black students in failing schools
- Relocating sexually abusive teachers would be more difficult under Pennsylvania bill
- DOJ backpedals on Louisiana voucher lawsuit
- Court says charter schools won’t pay for Atlanta’s pension debts
- Biggest education impact from shutdown? Furloughed bureaucrats
- Appeals court upholds Arizona school choice program
- Indiana’s voucher program expands; diversity a factor in one family’s choice of school
- ‘Vouchers don’t do much good for students’ claim is false
- NYC mayor’s race could affect school choice
- Vermont public school goes independent, raises ire from state bureaucracy
- Arizona education savings accounts aren’t vouchers, study says
- Legal institute fights Alabama union’s attempt to repeal school tax credit
- Experts: School choice improves education in public schools
- SC school-choice program helps special needs kids, could expand
- DOJ wants Louisiana parents out of voucher lawsuit
- U.S. House passes bill to prevent ‘passing the trash’
- ‘Non-traditional’ journalists barred from viewing tax-funded test results early
- New center hopes to help charter schools help kids with special needs
- Charter school advocate to Philadelphia schools: Listen to parents
- $45 million not enough for Philadelphia teachers’ union
- Study: Rhode Islanders support school choice
- Study: Choice would help failing Chicago schools
- Scholarships could lift SC school dedicated to real-life, hands-on learning
- Parents make good school choices, study says
- Divisive charter school reform bill headed toward vote in PA
- In Louisiana school voucher lawsuit, DOJ changes gears
- Opponents sue Washington to overturn charter school law
- School choice proponents’ challenge? Educating parents
- Judge: Federal oversight may not hamper school voucher program
- PA lawmakers push to amend tight teacher furlough policies
- College ready: A Milwaukee inner-city school success story
- Proposed economic furloughs could slay sacred cow of seniority in Pennsylvania schools
- What is Massachusetts doing right?
- Goldwater to appeal Louisiana school voucher decision
- Want to end poverty? Educate the kids
- Breakdown in Philly schools not only about the money
- North Carolina scholarship program on firm legal footing, attorney argues
- Philadelphia school district threatens charters
- Belief in student ability key to success at Milwaukee charter school
- Three things to know about Philadelphia’s school budget: Debt, pensions and safety
- Choosing to sue: Here’s a look at some 2013 lawsuits involving school choice
- Philly charter schools outperform district counterparts
- California students sue state over ineffective teachers
- Study: Public supports parent choice in education
- Under new management, Philly Renaissance Schools show growth
- New Orleans tops school choice index
- AZ to consider four school-choice expansion bills
- Florida family ‘blessed’ to be apart of scholarship program
- PA lawmakers put education at top of agenda in election year
- Louisiana: Feds ‘more interested in skin color than … education’
- Charter school for Philadelphia foster children will not be renewed
- Governor ties proposed PA education funding to targeted grants
- WA’s first charter school serves children, families of ‘extreme poverty’
- Vermont attempts to take independence from independent schools
- Philly stumbles on way to simplifying enrollment system
- Plan for Philly schools keeps charters in check
- Missouri ballot initiative would increase funding for public, private schools
- New York charter school focuses on family, community
- NC school vouchers on hold
- WI voucher bill would help special needs students denied open enrollment
- Philadelphia schools will end another year in red
- PA universities expect state, students to pick up tab on rising tuition
- Two ESA bills get House support in AZ
- Thousands rally to support New York charter schools
- California’s defense begins in Vergara trial
- Accountability or overregulation? Charter supporters split over Minnesota bill
- Bill would make Florida students eligible for scholarships