By Adam Tobias | Wisconsin Reporter
MADISON, Wis. — Wisconsin Democrats leading a secret investigation into conservative groups have brought in a heavy hitter — a former federal prosecutor who specialized in tracking terrorists.
Francis D. Schmitz, now in private practice in Waukesha, once served in the U.S. Department of Justice’s counterterrorism operations and helped apprehend a large group of foreigners carrying illegal visas, some of whom officials believed had ties with Sept. 11 hijackers.
Because of the secrecy surrounding the state’s so-called John Doe investigations, no one can say exactly how Schmitz, who rose to the rank of colonel in the U.S. Army, became the top prosecutor in the Democrats’ probe, which reportedly has spread to five counties.
“No prosecutor, whether or not they are involved in a John Doe, is going to make a comment on a secret John Doe proceeding,” Milwaukee County Assistant D.A. Bruce Landgraf said. “I mean, that is just not going to happen.”
Multiple sources told Wisconsin Reporter it’s easier to speculate about why Democrats chose Schmitz, one of George W. Bush’s three finalists for the position of U.S. attorney for the Milwaukee-based Eastern District of Wisconsin.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph Wall, who worked for years alongside Schmitz, said he wasn’t surprised to learn his former colleague has been assigned to the John Doe probe.
“His ethics are beyond reproach,” Wall said. “He brings no bias to an investigation, other than to just basically find the truth.”
Others are more skeptical.
“It’s pretty clear what they’re up to here,” said a source, who requested anonymity because of his proximity to the investigation.
The Democrats hired Schmitz, the source said, because they think “his anti-terror experience will intimidate. I don’t think it’s too much to say it is designed to terrify some people.”
However, another source noted that whatever Schmitz’s skills are in spycraft, he has no First Amendment experience and no election-law background.
A source speculates that Schmitz, because of his “nominal ties to Republicans, gives a hyper-partisan investigation the public appearance of fairness.”
Though gagged by provisions of subpoenas issued by Milwaukee County’s Landgraf and others, multiple sources have told Wisconsin Reporter the Democrats’ manifold legal attack on nonprofit conservative organizations has included after-hours visits to homes and offices; confiscated equipment and files; and demands for phone, email and other records.
Those sources told Wisconsin Reporter the Democrats’ ultimate goal is to take down Republican Gov. Scott Walker — or to seriously hobble him during his 2014 re-election campaign. They note that news of the investigation broke about the time Democrat Mary Burke announced she would run against Walker.
When contacted by Wisconsin Reporter, Schmitz repeatedly declined to discuss the secret case, or even to acknowledge its existence.
By law, he can’t comment. Like the scores of individuals who have reportedly been subpoenaed or questioned in the investigation, Schmitz is bound to secrecy by Wisconsin’s long-standing John Doe law. Breaking that silence could land a violator behind bars.
Schmitz won’t even say much about himself. Asked Wednesday for details of his background, the prosecutor hesitated.
“Let me think about whether it’s even proper for me to acknowledge that,” Schmitz said, seconds before ending the short phone conversation.
Fortunately, there’s his LinkedIn profile, which reveals that Schmitz has spent most of his career working for an agency known for keeping secrets, serving in various positions at the Department of Justice from May 1983 to March 2013. He spent most of that time as an assistant U.S. attorney in the eastern district in Milwaukee.
During those three decades with the DOJ, Schmitz specialized in criminal and civil litigation, crisis response planning, international anti-terrorism training, management evaluations and policy development.
Schmitz, who also was a member of the DOJ’s National Security Division in Washington, D.C., for five years, was one of three finalists in 2002 for the U.S. attorney position at the eastern district of Milwaukee.
The job eventually went to Steven Biskupic, who worked alongside Schmitz in Milwaukee for several years.
Schmitz, a 1982 graduate of Marquette University Law School, also was the DOJ’s national crisis management coordinator and a member of its counterterrorism section.
Tracy M. Johnson, executive assistant U.S. attorney, confirmed that Schmitz had been employed at the Milwaukee office as an assistant U.S. attorney and retired earlier this year.
Because Schmitz is no longer with the U.S. attorney’s office, the DOJ cannot comment on his employment history, according to Dean Puschnig, law enforcement community coordinator for the state’s eastern district.
“It’s the policy of the Department of Justice not to provide any information on retired employees,” Puschnig said.
Biskupic also declined to talk about Schmitz because of potential conflicts with one of Biskupic’s clients.
“Obviously, I worked with Fran a long time and I have a lot of respect for him, and I’m going to leave it at that because … I’m also the lawyer for Friends of Scott Walker,” said Biskupic, who now runs his own practice.
Messages left with some of Schmitz’s former colleagues who still are employed at the U.S. attorney’s office in Milwaukee were not returned.
Wall, the only one to respond, worked with Schmitz on a late-1990s case that led to the conviction of the owners of an aluminum smelting firm who used their company as a springboard for a variety of fraudulent schemes. The trial lasted five weeks, and the pair worked close to 20-hour days in that span, Wall said.
“The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel at that time called it the most complicated fraud scheme ever indicted in Wisconsin,” he said.
Schmitz also had been involved in a high-profile investigation in the early 2000s that resulted in the apprehension of 70 people accused of bribing U.S. embassy officials to get illegal visas, including seven who ended up in Wisconsin.
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel on July 12, 2002, reported that the seven were part of a larger group of foreigners from Jordan, Pakistan, Syria and Bangladesh who allegedly paid at least $10,000 each to an employee at the U.S. Embassy in Qatar between April 2000 and July 2001.
As part of the conspiracy, they received authentic six-month visas without security screenings or government authorization. Three were reported to have lived with Sept. 11 terrorists.
Shortly before he stepped down as assistant U.S. attorney earlier this year, Schmitz was also highly critical of an undercover sting in Milwaukee by the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
A Journal Sentinel investigation brought to light several mistakes in the investigation, including guns stolen from agents, sensitive documents lost, charges brought against innocent people and a burglary of the sting storefront.
Schmitz told a judge he didn’t think the operation was the best use of law enforcement resources. He also didn’t believe the sting went far enough in going after violent offenders.
Perhaps it shouldn’t come as a surprise the Milwaukee County District Attorney’s office has brought in a big gun to serve as special prosecutor in the latest John Doe probe.
The counterterrorism expert would seem to fit the John Doe operating manual for the Democratic prosecutor’s office. A previous John Doe probe launched by Milwaukee County D.A. John Chisholm in 2010 employed Milwaukee County Assistant D.A. David Robles, who has spearheaded the office’s anti-gang investigations.
In John Doe One, Milwaukee commercial real estate broker Andrew P. Jensen Jr. was arrested without being charged for failing to cooperate with the ongoing investigation. Sources told the Journal Sentinel that Robles personally arrested Jensen for refusing to cooperate, arguably an indication of the aggressive nature of the investigations that sources say have terrorized conservatives in an assault on basic constitutional rights.
Jensen was later quietly exonerated.
Contact Adam Tobias at email@example.com or follow him on Twitter at @Scoop_Tobias
- Sources: Secret probe targeting conservatives is abuse of prosecutorial powers
- Scary! Phantom prosecutor in Dems’ war on conservatives disappears inside courthouse
- EXCLUSIVE: Judge in Democrat-led John Doe probe recuses herself
- Democrats’ ‘intelligence-gathering’ spreads in Wisconsin
- Democrats tap anti-terror expert to head secret probe of Wisconsin conservatives
- Sheriff Clarke: John Doe case shows Milwaukee DA is ‘weaponized for political purposes’
- Clarke: John Doe into conservatives ‘unbridled,’ ‘dangerous’ and ‘tainted’
- Sources: New judge named in Democrat-led secret probe
- Vendetta justice? Criticism growing about John Doe prosecutor Bruce Landgraf
- Will Wisconsin’s own ‘Miserable’ inspector jail conservative activist for speaking out about Dem probe?
- Conservative targets bring in big guns to Democrat-led John Doe fight
- ‘Dangerous’ game: Former FEC official blasts Democrats’ secret investigation of conservative groups
- Center for Media and Democracy: Liberals are morally superior
- Wisconsin Dems suddenly support political investigations
- WI Republican attorney general to represent judges in Democrat-led John Doe probe
- Republicans speak out about silent John Doe targeting conservatives
- Biggest secret in John Doe may be just how judges and special prosecutors are selected
- WSJ: John Doe judge deals body blow to secret probe targeting conservatives
- Vos: Wait until John Doe in ‘rearview mirror’ before revisiting law
- Lawsuits looming in Wisconsin’s crumbling John Doe probe?
- Conservative to Democrat prosecutors: Shut down secret political probe or face civil rights lawsuit
- John Doe target O’Keefe taking on IRS, too
- Lawmaker: Wisconsin’s John Doe like Christie’s ‘Bridgegate’
- Target files civil rights lawsuit against Wisconsin’s John Doe prosecutors
- Disparate treatment: Civil rights lawsuit claims conservative speech trampled
- Liberal group looking to take Wisconsin’s John Doe national
- John Doe judge: ‘Results of the John Doe speak for themselves’
- John Doe special prosecutor appeals judge’s ruling quashing subpoenas
- John Doe prosecutor pushed for brain-damaged man’s conviction in ATF debacle
- Conservatives counterpunch John Doe prosecutors’ move to stall injunction
- Shadowy John Doe investigator invokes federalism in civil rights lawsuit
- John Doe prosecutors wanted higher-priced lawyers, source says
- Secret agent Dean Nickel’s defense: ‘Dean Nickel is not responsible’
- D’oh! John Doe prosecutors claim secrecy protection – after filing secret documents
- Recusal in John Doe case raises questions of fairness, purpose
- Absolute immunity makes it tough to prosecute the prosecutors of John Doe
- Poll suggests Dems’ big ‘secret’ weapon against Walker is backfiring
- ‘Easy target': Kelly Rindfleisch breaks silence about John Doe probe
- SCOTUS ruling on campaign finance shows abuse of John Doe, targets say
- Nobody will say what John Doe’s shadow man did, but taxpayers are paying his legal bill
- Judge denies John Doe prosecutors’ move to dismiss civil rights suit
- Civil rights expert: John Doe law is ‘un-American,’ like something from ‘Nazi Germany’
- Target: John Doe prosecutors making up campaign law as they go along
- John Doe, as it is being used, must go, WI senator says
- John Doe target says prosecutors latest move another delay tactic
- John Doe prosecutors sound defensive in latest court filings
- Federal judge denies John Doe prosecutors’ motion to stall civil rights case
- Media coalition asks judge to open sealed John Doe documents
- Are John Doe prosecutors sweating out federal judge’s decision?
- John Doe is dead: Judge stops WI prosecutors’ probe into conservatives
- This is what the Fourth Amendment looks like?
- What’s next for now-defunct John Doe probe?
- Appeals court stalls judge’s order halting John Doe probe
- Federal judge’s ruling could open up sealed John Doe records
- Federal judge orders John Doe probe shut down again
- Lawmakers call for review of GAB’s secret John Doe activities, funds
- Lawyers, lawyers everywhere and other dispatches from John Doe Land
- Secret’s out: The world is beginning to learn more about WI’s John Doe
- Still their little secret? Questions remain on John Doe gag order
- Appeals Court declares portions of Wisconsin campaign finance law unconstitutional
- John Doe prosecutors suddenly support opening sealed court records
- Expert: It’s as if GAB decided ‘Citizens United didn’t exist’
- John Doe prosecutors voice phony outrage, legal source says
- GAB still reviewing court ruling declaring WI campaign finance law unconstitutional
- State Farm still doesn’t want to cover John Doe prosecutor’s legal bills
- For the Walker-hating left, John Doe is ‘Mission Accomplished’
- Sources: No urgency in WI Supreme Court on John Doe
- Would Walker settlement with John Doe prosecutors be a deal with the devil?
- Contempt questions surround reported John Doe deal talks
- Walker’s John Doe response raises more questions than answers
- Sources: Attorney General passes on defending GAB in John Doe cases
- Attorney to judge: Don’t let John Doe prosecutor ‘moot’ injunction
- John Doe targets sue Wisconsin’s Government Accountability Board
- Federal judge says his order halting John Doe probe should be clear to prosecutor
- John Doe special prosecutor’s bill still shrouded in secrecy
- ‘Are these kind of armed pre-dawn raids standard operating procedure?’
- John Doe special prosecutor obeys judge’s order
- ‘Never-ending’ John Doe never ended, WSJ reports
- Appeals court upholds judge’s order shutting down John Doe probe
- O’Keefe keeps collecting big wins in John Doe lawsuit
- John Doe I judge says he’s not responsible for John Doe II
- Will taxpayers have to pay for frivolity of John Doe prosecutors?
- John Doe prosecutors jump back into the dark?
- What about those prosecutors? Questions surround other John Doe DAs
- Humiliated in court, WI Dems take their anti-conservative John Doe probe to the media
- Federal judge blasts John Doe prosecutors – again – as he denies records release
- Right on cue: Document dump fuels anti-Walker donation drive
- Wall Street Journal points out ‘disgrace’ of mainstream John Doe reporting
- Expert: John Doe raids raise ‘troubling’ Fourth Amendment questions
- Kelly Rindfleisch tells conservatives, ‘Don’t back down’
- Mainstream media forced to walk back Walker ‘criminal scheme’ narrative
- John Doe prosecutors engaged in premature justification, conservatives say
- Is John Doe probe a case of a mini NSA in Wisconsin?
- AG opinion means accountability board’s John Doe secrets are safe — for now
- Senator asks attorney general to compel GAB to open up its books
- GAB now playing secrets in state John Doe lawsuit
- Will John Doe prosecutors launch lengthy probe against Trek Bicycle?
- John Doe prosecutors engaged in war of words — lots and lots of words
- Judge denies conservatives’ request to add GAB to civil rights lawsuit
- Oral arguments set in John Doe prosecutors’ appeal
- In John Doe Land, the left doesn’t illegally coordinate
- John Doe document blitz must have broken mainstream media’s heart
- Senator: Looks like accountability board is hiding something
- Kelly Rindfleisch appeal to test validity of John Doe digital searches
- Conservatives in John Doe battle know disclosure comes with a heavy price
- Appeals court orders release of some John Doe documents
- Taxpayers on the hook up to $25,000 for GAB’s legal maneuvers
- Overheated media erroneously bring back Walker ‘criminal scheme’ theme
- ‘Retaliation': Docs show state prosecutors launched mini-NSA probe of WI conservatives
- John Doe prosecutors take desperate, unethical slap
- Walker ‘smoking gun’ story has tiny glaring flaw
- Wisconsin prosecutors aim to shut down conservatives
- Conservatives appeal to common sense in John Doe appeals case
- Conservatives say ‘incorrect disclosure’ of John Doe docs no ‘tiny error’
- First Amendment big guns back targets of John Doe probe
- Was John Doe judge a rubber stamp?
- $25,000 and counting: WI taxpayers’ bill so far to defend GAB and its ‘monster’
- Another blow for Wisconsin’s restrictive campaign finance law
- Wisconsin prosecutors appeal for protection from blowback in partisan probe
- Is John Doe story colored with a bit of ‘Macbeth?’
- GAB director says agency just following the law in John Doe probe
- Kelly Rindfleisch: Where are the tears for the kids the Milwaukee school system failed?
- Rindfleisch attorney: Appeals court can protect the Fourth Amendment in Digital Age
- Source: Wisconsin Supreme Court doesn’t want political heat of John Doe case
- Appeals court reverses John Doe injunction, but Wisconsin’s secret war far from over
- A whistleblower’s story: Taking on a ‘hyper-partisan’ district attorney
- Conservative O’Keefe seeks investigation into John Chisholm and his John Doe
- Who’s paying the bill? Report casts questions on GAB and John Doe payments
- Target of secret John Doe probe is fighting back and speaking out
- The day John Doe rushed through the door
- Rindfleisch: ‘Rape’ not too strong a word for how violated John Doe targets feel
- Conservative group asks court to stop John Doe ‘constitutional injury’
- Conservatives to appeals court: ‘You don’t know Doe’
- Armed and growing: Milwaukee County DA beefs up his ‘police force’
- Federal judge stops John Doe prosecutors from bothering conservative group
- Wisconsin Supreme Court takes another pass on John Doe case
- No surprise: Bice buries the lead, Walker follows the law
- Federalism v. individual rights: A conversation with Eric O’Keefe
- Report: No district attorney will investigate District Attorney John Chisholm
- Appeals court denies request to rehear John Doe civil rights case
- Voters say ‘yes’ to Walker, ‘no’ to John Doe, law expert says
- Vos: There will be reforms to John Doe, GAB
- GAB, Milwaukee County DA bail on key provision behind war on conservatives
- John Doe lawsuit could be headed to U.S. Supreme Court
- Kelly Rindfleisch will fight on in Fourth Amendment case
- John Doe froze conservative speech, targets say
- Conservatives to court: Open up records on GAB’s role in John Doe
- Did the GAB doctor documents to cover their tracks in John Doe?
- Wisconsin’s Van Hollen says goodbye to AG post, John Doe
- Rindfleisch appeals to Supreme Court in John Doe Fourth Amendment abuse case
- Audit: GAB has failed to follow the law
- Wisconsin Supreme Court to take up John Doe complaints
- ‘R word’ surfaces in wake of state Supreme Court taking up John Doe challenges
- GAB won’t say whether it has reauthorized its role in John Doe probe
- Rogue agency defied judges to carry out partisan probe of Wisconsin conservatives
- ‘Outside the … law’: Lawmakers call for investigation of GAB
- Attorney: GAB’s John Doe justifications don’t hold up to law
- Isn’t it ironic: Mainstream silence follows reports of secret GAB Gmail in John Doe
- GAB offers contradictory defense of its John Doe activities
- O’Keefe officially asks judge to open probe into John ‘Doe’ Chisholm
- State lawmakers look to investigate the GAB and its investigators
- One year ago, judge’s ruling shakes up John Doe probe
- Doe possessed: ‘They have information about every aspect of our lives’
- GAB plays victim card in ‘complicated’ John Doe, campaign finance farce
- Public defender asks Supreme Court to take up John Doe-related Fourth Amendment case
- GAB has a sudden change of heart on campaign finance reform
- O’Keefe takes his case against John Doe to U.S. Supreme Court
- Conservatives: GAB’s meeting minutes show gap in board’s John Doe oversight
- How Wisconsin media support DA’s war on conservatives
- Federal judge’s judgment takes John Doe probe off life support
- Following judge’s order killing John Doe, what’s next?
- First Amendment expert: Wisconsin ought to be ‘embarrassed’ by John Doe
- Does chief justice have conflict of interest in John Doe case?
- Conservative groups ask U.S. Supreme Court to defend rights of John Doe targets