By Jon Cassidy | Watchdog.org
HOUSTON — State Sen. Judith Zaffirini has made headlines twice in recent months for using her clout with University of Texas officials on behalf of well-connected applicants. Those stories reported e-mails that Zaffirini sent Dec. 3, 2010 and March 1, 2013.
Watchdog.org has obtained a third email Zaffirini sent, on Oct. 14, 2012, on behalf of another well-connected applicant, as well as an email from UT board member Steve Hicks on behalf of an applicant to UT’s computer science program.
Unlike letters of recommendation sent through the admissions process, Zaffirini’s emails go over the heads of admissions officials and land straight in the inboxes of UT President Bill Powers and Chancellor Francisco Cigarroa.
After Watchdog.org disclosed the first clout letter and then reported the children of three influential lawmakers had been admitted to UT School of Law despite dubious qualifications, Cigarroa announced an inquiry into admissions favoritism.
None of the emails published so far explicitly mention any sort of quid pro quo, but none need do so, as the recipients all know Zaffirini is the most powerful voice on higher education funding in the Texas Legislature. Even so, in one of the emails, Zaffirini mentions how much funding she’s secured for the university before switching topics to the applicant.
That email, first reported Thursday by the Texas Tribune, wasn’t produced by the university in a recent response to a public records request, although other March 1, 2013, email exchanges between Zaffirini’s and Power’s offices regarding the exact same meeting were produced. The omission underscores Regent Wallace Hall’s criticism of the university’s handling of public records requests.
The clout email was distributed to eight members of the UT System Board of Regents recently. Presumably, one of those members leaked it to the Tribune.
The third clout email, just now being published, is from Oct. 14, 2012. Zaffirini wrote Cigarroa and Powers, copying Vice Chancellor Randa Safady and Powers’ right hand, Nancy Brazzil, on behalf of an undergraduate applicant to UT.
“Francisco and Bill: Attached is a copy of the letter that I sent to Kedra Ishop, UT admissions director, enthusiastically recommending (name redacted) for admission to UT. He is a truly wonderful young man who ‘bleeds burnt orange,’ and I hope that you will support his admission. Randa and Nancy: Please help! Thanks/Z”
Cigarroa responded, “I thank you so very much for forwarding your letter regarding (name redacted). Your perspectives mean so very much to UT System and I know UT Austin!”
Although he clearly has some idea already, Cigarroa has been looking into whether letters of this sort had much influence on an applicant’s fate. The results of that preliminary inquiry are now available to members of the UT Board of Regents, who will decide whether to launch a full investigation.
So far, that draft report remains confidential, other than Zaffirini clout email No. 2. The Tribune story reporting that email was a surprise to people who have been following this issue closely, as the Tribune has generally ignored the issue of favoritism, instead framing the story as a “witch hunt” against Powers.
But the Tribune’s own credibility, and especially the credibility of its “witch hunt” narrative, have been called into question recently. A former TV news reporter named James Moore published a massive takedown of the Tribune two weeks ago, criticizing the outlet for taking money from scores of companies and people with interests before the Legislature and failing to disclose the amounts.
The story was picked up by the Huffington Post. Last Friday, the Tribune announced it would start publishing amounts it had received from corporate donors. According to its new disclosures, the Tribune’s second biggest all-time corporate contributor is the University of Texas at Austin, with $525,000.
That makes it difficult for the Tribune to continue dismissing evidence of admissions favoritism as the product of a “witch hunt.”
To date, the clearest evidence of favoritism is Watchdog.org’s report that Jeffrey Steven Carona, Carlos Manuel Zaffirini Jr. and James Ryan Pitts – the children, respectively, of state Sen. John Carona, state Sen. Judith Zaffirini and state Rep. Jim Pitts – have failed the Texas bar exam eight times between them.
That’s uncommon for UT law grads, as 256 of the 268 Longhorns sitting for their first try last July passed the exam.
Carona and Zaffirini failed the bar three times each before ultimately passing; only five UT students in the last eight years have failed it more. Pitts failed the test twice last year, and presumably took the test again last month.
Now that doesn’t prove they weren’t qualified for admission to UT, as you’d need their grades and LSAT scores to say for sure. Watchdog.org did, however, recently obtain LSAT scores for Pitts, and they’re well below UT’s usual standards.
According to information obtained through a public records request, Pitts scored a 155 and a 147 on the test, which is scored on a scale of 120 to 180. Those scores rank in the 64th percentile and 33rd percentile nationwide.
UT generally draws from a higher tier of applicants, with scores in the 25th to 75th percentiles of its class ranging from 163-170.
Zaffirini isn’t the only official who has intervened in the admissions process.
Steve Hicks, a UT System board member who has sided with Powers, wrote to Powers on Feb. 11, 2013, after a UT alum emailed him complaining that his son Christopher was having a hard time with the admissions process.
“Please understand that this is not a request to help him with admission,” Hicks wrote, mindful of the obvious implication. Hicks said he was just concerned about the “process,” although the only procedural issue raised by the letter was that other schools were more interested in Christopher than UT.
On Feb. 25, 2013, Brazzil emailed Powers to ask if he had told Hicks the news that Christopher, the applicant, had been rejected by the computer science and electrical engineering programs, and was in line for a spot in general studies.
Three days later, Hicks tried to set up a dinner with Powers and Cigarroa at his house for the week of March 11, 2013. The dinner had to be postponed to March 21, 2013, though, because Powers was flying to the Bahamas with billionaire trial lawyer Joe Jamail for spring break.
Contact Jon Cassidy at [email protected] or @jpcassidy000. If you would like to send him documents or messages anonymously, download the Tor browser and go to our SecureDrop submission page: http://5bygo7e2rpnrh5vo.onion
- Texas’ Rep. Pitts announces retirement after improper influence story
- University of Texas regents show support for Wallace Hall
- Case against UT regent Wallace Hall is a sham — here’s proof
- Texas senator got $477k for supposed ‘cameo’ appearance in Wallace Hall lawsuit
- Lawmaker admits pulling strings on UT admissions
- Trustee accused of crime for rejecting dodgy accounting
- Longhorns: Senator used clout in UT law school admissions
- Children of Texas lawmakers get into UT School of Law, but struggle to pass bar exam
- Chancellor is probing favoritism in UT admissions
- UT report: Charge against Hall is legally ‘absurd’
- Attorney in UT case hides six-figure charges despite terms of contract
- University of Texas clout scandal grows as new e-mails surface
- Four more get into UT Law despite low LSATs
- Reports on UT favoritism, impeachment expected soon
- Attorney: Secret tape covered up by lawmakers proves regent’s innocence
- Dozens of UT Law’s least qualified students are connected politically
- University of Texas uncovers admissions corruption, halts investigation
- UT admissions: Straus, Branch, Pitts pulled strings
- Who got the 128? UT Law admits students with bad LSAT scores
- Patrick’s win may doom Hall impeachment effort
- Chancellor promises complete investigation of UT admissions
- Board to decide UT president’s fate Thursday
- Texas politicians smarten up, ditch UT pres this time around
- Tribune story may have doomed UT’s Powers
- Academics condone the privilege they denounce
- Three essential stories on the UT admissions scandal
- Texas AG Greg Abbott embraces Roe v. Wade
- Roe v. Wade is AG’s new pretext for blocking Texas law school investigation
- Two UT regents pressed for records destruction
- New crime invented for Hall: assisted guesswork
- Texas lawmaker failed to disclose his own clout letter in UT flap
- Texas legislator Fischer insists on role in UT investigation
- Hutchison pulled strings for friends’ kids and grandkids at UT
- Ex-UT Law dean’s credit card bill: $400k in four years
- Abbott’s UT picks are pro-affirmative action
- Report: University of Texas showed favoritism to thousands
- Kroll ignored hundreds of weak UT applications
- Billionaire defends UT admissions privileges for ‘leaders’
- Weak admissions to University of Texas Law increased after Sager’s ouster
- Kroll report takes dig at Watchdog.org
- Hicks won’t stop UT’s backdoor admits
- Texas governor’s wife was on UT nominee’s payroll
- Bill to limit UT oversight clears committee
- UT regent blasts speaker for ‘abuse of office’
- Texas politician rebuts himself with apparently plagiarized letter
- Pay-to-play scandal involves UT dean, Texas Exes
- Supreme Court asked to look at UT’s backdoor admissions program
- Lawmakers want UT applications shielded from scrutiny
- McRaven makes UT scandal his own
- An open letter to Attorney General Ken Paxton on the UT cover-up
- Chancellor Bill McRaven’s UT cover-up has no defenders
- UT’s back door still open, but can’t stay secret, AG rules
- Whitewash: Kroll left dozens of bad LSATs out of UT report
- McRaven’s defense to Hall lawsuit refuted by own words
- Ready for the end of affirmative action?
- UT admissions scandal is 10 times bigger than official report
- McRaven trolls Dallas Morning News
- Powers to get top salary at UT Law
- UT sues to block Watchdog access to admissions investigation
- UT approves ‘Spinal Tap’ policy for backdoor admissions
- Admissions survey: No, UT, everybody doesn’t do it
- UT admissions scandal prompts new investigation
- Ticket scandal a black mark for UT, DA
- Showdown over UT cover-up nears end
- McRaven’s rationale for UT cover-up denounced by regents, AG
- High court to decide if University of Texas can deep-six investigation
- High court hears arguments on whether UT can bury investigation
- Testimony by UT contradicts story fed high court