By Jon Cassidy | Watchdog.org
Four students were admitted to the University of Texas School of Law despite LSAT scores way below the school’s average and grade-point averages between 2.66 and 3.38, according to records made public this week.
The four students all had LSAT scores between 150 and 155, which place them in the 44th to 64th percentile of test-takers nationwide.
Almost all successful applicants to UT Law have a score of 160 or better on the test, which is scored from 120 to 180. Roughly three-quarters of a typical class at UT Law scores a 163 or better, which puts them in th 89th percentile and above.
The scores are just the latest evidence that UT officials may have been playing favorites in the admissions process to please influential lawmakers or others.
Those low scores were the subject of an email from UT System officials, which was among some 2,000 pages of emails the UT System made available this week to favored news outlets, Watchdog.org not among them.
The credit for pulling that key bit of information from the pile of records goes to the Texas Tribune’s Reeve Hamilton, whose eyes have opened recently to the growing body of evidence of favoritism. The other reporters covering the document dump missed that email, instead reporting on how some people feel about other people.
The document dump comes as UT System public records officials prepare for a meeting Thursday with members of the media over complaints of favoritism in the release of records.
Twice recently, the school provided David Barer of the Dallas Morning News with public records that other news outlets requested unsuccessfully. First, Barer got a copy of UT President Bill Powers’ job evaluations, which had been denied to three other news outlets, including Watchdog.org. Then he got some correspondence from UT board chairman Paul Foster to Chancellor Francisco Cigarroa, despite the fact that every major newspaper in the state — and Watchdog.org — requested that sort of correspondence after Cigarroa announced he would resign later this year.
UT made that correspondence available Monday to just three of the media outlets that asked for it, despite state law requiring it to “treat all requests for information uniformly.”
Contact Jon Cassidy at email@example.com or @jpcassidy000. If you would like to send him documents or messages anonymously, download the Tor browser and go to our SecureDrop submission page: http://5bygo7e2rpnrh5vo.onion
- Texas’ Rep. Pitts announces retirement after improper influence story
- University of Texas regents show support for Wallace Hall
- Case against UT regent Wallace Hall is a sham — here’s proof
- Texas senator got $477k for supposed ‘cameo’ appearance in Wallace Hall lawsuit
- Lawmaker admits pulling strings on UT admissions
- Trustee accused of crime for rejecting dodgy accounting
- Longhorns: Senator used clout in UT law school admissions
- Children of Texas lawmakers get into UT School of Law, but struggle to pass bar exam
- Chancellor is probing favoritism in UT admissions
- UT report: Charge against Hall is legally ‘absurd’
- Attorney in UT case hides six-figure charges despite terms of contract
- University of Texas clout scandal grows as new e-mails surface
- Four more get into UT Law despite low LSATs
- Reports on UT favoritism, impeachment expected soon
- Attorney: Secret tape covered up by lawmakers proves regent’s innocence
- Dozens of UT Law’s least qualified students are connected politically
- University of Texas uncovers admissions corruption, halts investigation
- UT admissions: Straus, Branch, Pitts pulled strings
- Who got the 128? UT Law admits students with bad LSAT scores
- Patrick’s win may doom Hall impeachment effort
- Chancellor promises complete investigation of UT admissions
- Board to decide UT president’s fate Thursday
- Texas politicians smarten up, ditch UT pres this time around
- Tribune story may have doomed UT’s Powers
- Academics condone the privilege they denounce
- Three essential stories on the UT admissions scandal
- Texas AG Greg Abbott embraces Roe v. Wade
- Roe v. Wade is AG’s new pretext for blocking Texas law school investigation
- Two UT regents pressed for records destruction
- New crime invented for Hall: assisted guesswork
- Texas lawmaker failed to disclose his own clout letter in UT flap
- Texas legislator Fischer insists on role in UT investigation
- Hutchison pulled strings for friends’ kids and grandkids at UT
- Ex-UT Law dean’s credit card bill: $400k in four years
- Abbott’s UT picks are pro-affirmative action
- Report: University of Texas showed favoritism to thousands
- Kroll ignored hundreds of weak UT applications
- Billionaire defends UT admissions privileges for ‘leaders’
- Weak admissions to University of Texas Law increased after Sager’s ouster
- Kroll report takes dig at Watchdog.org
- Hicks won’t stop UT’s backdoor admits
- Texas governor’s wife was on UT nominee’s payroll
- Bill to limit UT oversight clears committee
- UT regent blasts speaker for ‘abuse of office’
- Texas politician rebuts himself with apparently plagiarized letter
- Pay-to-play scandal involves UT dean, Texas Exes
- Supreme Court asked to look at UT’s backdoor admissions program
- Lawmakers want UT applications shielded from scrutiny
- McRaven makes UT scandal his own
- An open letter to Attorney General Ken Paxton on the UT cover-up
- Chancellor Bill McRaven’s UT cover-up has no defenders
- UT’s back door still open, but can’t stay secret, AG rules
- Whitewash: Kroll left dozens of bad LSATs out of UT report
- McRaven’s defense to Hall lawsuit refuted by own words
- Ready for the end of affirmative action?
- UT admissions scandal is 10 times bigger than official report
- McRaven trolls Dallas Morning News
- Powers to get top salary at UT Law
- UT sues to block Watchdog access to admissions investigation
- UT approves ‘Spinal Tap’ policy for backdoor admissions
- Admissions survey: No, UT, everybody doesn’t do it