Home  >  Texas  >  Who got the 128? UT Law admits students with bad LSAT scores

Who got the 128? UT Law admits students with bad LSAT scores

By   /   May 23, 2014  /   News  /   No Comments

Part 19 of 72 in the series Trouble in Texas
Brandon Watts/Creative Commons

NOT THAT TOUGH: Who got 128? UT Law has admitted students with atrocious LSAT scores.

By Jon Cassidy | Watchdog.org

HOUSTON — By reputation, the University of Texas School of Law is practically the Harvard of the Southwest.

By the quality of some of the students it lets in, however, UT Law would have a hard time beating West Amarillo Upstairs Law College.

Dozens of students admitted to UT Law in recent years have scores on the Law School Admissions Test, or LSAT, that are below the standards of the lowest ranked law schools in the country, a Watchdog.org investigation into admissions favoritism has found.

The LSAT is scored on a scale of 120-180. UT Law students get a median score of 167, according to the 2014 US News survey, and the great majority of the class scores a 160 or better.

Even a score in the 170s with a near-perfect grade point average is no guarantee of admission, as this roster of self-reported scores for UT applicants from lawschoolnumbers.com makes clear. (Those applications are worth skimming for anybody unfamiliar with UT Law’s standards.)

Most lower tier law schools nationwide accept students with LSAT scores in the 150s.

With a score below 150, you’re something of a longshot even at the lowest ranked law schools in the country.

The University of La Verne College of Law in California, for example, came in dead last in the peer reputation survey on the 2013 US News rankings of accredited law schools, yet three-quarters of its students scored a 150 or better.

In recent years, UT Law has admitted students not just with LSATs in the 140s, but with scores as low as 138, 137, 136, even 128. Several of them were rejected by other Texas law schools of lesser reputation.

A 128 is down at the very bottom 1 percent of test-takers nationwide. It means the person got less than a quarter of the answers correct.

State Sen. Dan Patrick called for an investigation into admissions favoritism at UT Law earlier this week.

“As a parent or grandparent, if your son or grandson or daughter or granddaughter has the LSAT scores to get in, and a legislator with influence gets their child or relative or friend or donor’s friend in, then that’s not right,” Patrick said. “That can bring down the whole law school.”

Watchdog.org requested the LSAT scores of 122 UT Law students from four other public law schools in Texas, figuring that most people apply to more than one law school.

We obtained scores for 47 people from the other schools, almost all of them with names redacted. Only six of the 47 scores were above 160.

THE TRACK: This bell curve from Zen of 180 shows how test-takers nationwide fare on the LSAT.

The average high score for the applicants on our lists was 149.7, which is barely good enough for the worst law schools in the country. Even schools like Whittier Law College and Golden Gate University School of Law, which put less than a fifth of their graduates into full-time jobs, expect most of their class to have scores above 150.

A few commenters attacked Watchdog.org’s recent report on the political connections of dozens of students who had failed the bar exam at least twice in recent years, on the grounds that bar failure didn’t prove that the student had poor LSAT scores. The argument, in other words, is that just because somebody failed the bar (twice) doesn’t mean he didn’t deserve his place at UT.

These LSAT scores, however, prove just that. Almost every score we got was somewhere between borderline and horrendous.

There were 18-24 scores below 150 and five to six scores below 140. Because the names were blacked out, we had to assume that a 137 on Texas Tech’s list, for example, might be the same person who got a 137 on Texas Southern University’s list.

The 122 names we requested came from a database we built to tally the number of times UT Law grads had failed the bar. We requested the LSAT scores of the 90 Longhorns who failed the bar two or more times from 2006-2013. We figured that their struggles to pass the bar — 42 of them never passed — made them the most likely candidates to have benefited from favoritism.

We requested the scores of 26 others who passed the bar on a second try, who also either shared a last name with a lawmaker or who had already attained a high-level government job.

Then we picked six current UT Law students, five for no reason other than to obscure our interest in the sixth: Jonathan Seliger, son of state Sen. Kel Seliger, who is chairman of the Higher Education Committee. (We have no reason to doubt Seliger’s qualifications, other than his father’s position and the general pattern of legislative influence on admissions.)

If we could have predicted our scores would be provided without names attached, we would have asked just for the 90 double flunkies, so as not to contaminate our failure pool with success. All six of the scores of 160 or better might well have come from Seliger and his classmates, who have yet to take the bar.

While conventional wisdom holds that LSAT and other standardized test scores are private under federal law, the conventional wisdom is mistaken. The Family Education Rights Privacy Act, or FERPA, only applies to applicants’ records once they “matriculate” at a school. If they never attend, their test scores never become private under federal law (grades, however, remain private).

State law generally treats education records identically to federal law. Texas A&M complied with the presumption of openness in state law and turned over five scores with names, one of which happened to be James Ryan Pitts, son of the state House Appropriations Committee chairman.

Texas Tech, the University of Houston, and Texas Southern University all appealed our request to Attorney General Greg Abbott, whose office decided that the U.S. Constitution provides a right to take these standardized tests anonymously.

Then Abbott apparently changed his mind on Monday, but Texas Tech and TSU had already shared the scores.

We provide all three lists here (Texas Tech, Texas A&M, TSU) for any additional analysis and comments from readers. We did black out Texas A&M’s folks, so as not to single them out.

Since the names were blacked out, we have no way of confirming that every score comes from the person we requested, or that none came from someone with an identical name. We did provide middle names to all the schools, and birth dates and partial Social Security numbers to the schools that requested them.

Although it’s impossible to say conclusively from this sample whether affirmative action is a factor, as opposed to favoritism to a politician or a donor to UT’s Law School Foundation, we can say that the demographics of our list roughly reflect the state’s demographics.

Of the 122 names, 47 were Hispanic; the state’s Hispanic population is 35 percent of the total. Fourteen students applied to TSU, a historically black college. In inspecting 90 of the applicants more closely for our political favoritism story, we only noticed a handful of African Americans.

Contact Jon Cassidy at [email protected] or @jpcassidy000. If you would like to send him documents or messages anonymously, download the Tor browser and go to our SecureDrop submission page: http://5bygo7e2rpnrh5vo.onion

Part of 72 in the series Trouble in Texas
  1. Texas’ Rep. Pitts announces retirement after improper influence story
  2. University of Texas regents show support for Wallace Hall
  3. Case against UT regent Wallace Hall is a sham — here’s proof
  4. Texas senator got $477k for supposed ‘cameo’ appearance in Wallace Hall lawsuit
  5. Lawmaker admits pulling strings on UT admissions
  6. Trustee accused of crime for rejecting dodgy accounting
  7. Longhorns: Senator used clout in UT law school admissions
  8. Children of Texas lawmakers get into UT School of Law, but struggle to pass bar exam
  9. Chancellor is probing favoritism in UT admissions
  10. UT report: Charge against Hall is legally ‘absurd’
  11. Attorney in UT case hides six-figure charges despite terms of contract
  12. University of Texas clout scandal grows as new e-mails surface
  13. Four more get into UT Law despite low LSATs
  14. Reports on UT favoritism, impeachment expected soon
  15. Attorney: Secret tape covered up by lawmakers proves regent’s innocence
  16. Dozens of UT Law’s least qualified students are connected politically
  17. University of Texas uncovers admissions corruption, halts investigation
  18. UT admissions: Straus, Branch, Pitts pulled strings
  19. Who got the 128? UT Law admits students with bad LSAT scores
  20. Patrick’s win may doom Hall impeachment effort
  21. Chancellor promises complete investigation of UT admissions
  22. Board to decide UT president’s fate Thursday
  23. Texas politicians smarten up, ditch UT pres this time around
  24. Tribune story may have doomed UT’s Powers
  25. Academics condone the privilege they denounce
  26. Three essential stories on the UT admissions scandal
  27. Texas AG Greg Abbott embraces Roe v. Wade
  28. Roe v. Wade is AG’s new pretext for blocking Texas law school investigation
  29. Two UT regents pressed for records destruction
  30. New crime invented for Hall: assisted guesswork
  31. Texas lawmaker failed to disclose his own clout letter in UT flap
  32. Texas legislator Fischer insists on role in UT investigation
  33. Hutchison pulled strings for friends’ kids and grandkids at UT
  34. Ex-UT Law dean’s credit card bill: $400k in four years
  35. Abbott’s UT picks are pro-affirmative action
  36. Report: University of Texas showed favoritism to thousands
  37. Kroll ignored hundreds of weak UT applications
  38. Billionaire defends UT admissions privileges for ‘leaders’
  39. Weak admissions to University of Texas Law increased after Sager’s ouster
  40. Kroll report takes dig at Watchdog.org
  41. Hicks won’t stop UT’s backdoor admits
  42. Texas governor’s wife was on UT nominee’s payroll
  43. Bill to limit UT oversight clears committee
  44. UT regent blasts speaker for ‘abuse of office’
  45. Texas politician rebuts himself with apparently plagiarized letter
  46. Pay-to-play scandal involves UT dean, Texas Exes
  47. Supreme Court asked to look at UT’s backdoor admissions program
  48. Lawmakers want UT applications shielded from scrutiny
  49. McRaven makes UT scandal his own
  50. An open letter to Attorney General Ken Paxton on the UT cover-up
  51. Chancellor Bill McRaven’s UT cover-up has no defenders
  52. UT’s back door still open, but can’t stay secret, AG rules
  53. Whitewash: Kroll left dozens of bad LSATs out of UT report
  54. McRaven’s defense to Hall lawsuit refuted by own words
  55. Ready for the end of affirmative action?
  56. UT admissions scandal is 10 times bigger than official report
  57. McRaven trolls Dallas Morning News
  58. Powers to get top salary at UT Law
  59. UT sues to block Watchdog access to admissions investigation
  60. UT approves ‘Spinal Tap’ policy for backdoor admissions
  61. Admissions survey: No, UT, everybody doesn’t do it
  62. UT admissions scandal prompts new investigation
  63. Ticket scandal a black mark for UT, DA
  64. Showdown over UT cover-up nears end
  65. McRaven’s rationale for UT cover-up denounced by regents, AG
  66. High court to decide if University of Texas can deep-six investigation
  67. High court hears arguments on whether UT can bury investigation
  68. Testimony by UT contradicts story fed high court
  69. These ‘horns ain’t loyal, McRaven finds
  70. UT’s Hall challenges Abbott over board picks
  71. Texas Supreme Court nullifies rule of law; impunity to reign
  72. The battle for the Kroll records goes on

Sign-up for our Trouble in Texas email list to receive the latest news and in-depth coverage.

Click here to get this great content in print


Jon Cassidy was a former Houston-based reporter for Watchdog.org.