Home  >  Pennsylvania  >  Federal stimulus warped PA’s education spending in both directions

Federal stimulus warped PA’s education spending in both directions

By   /   March 5, 2012  /   2 Comments

Tomalis: Stimulus 'kicked the can' down the road for districts with financial difficulties
By: Eric Boehm | PA Independent
HARRISBURG — Federal stimulus money warped Pennsylvania’s education budget both upward and downward during the past three years, and the state’s 500 school districts and 12.6 million taxpayers are beginning to see the consequences.

Beginning in the 2009-10 budget year, Pennsylvania school districts received a boost in funding from the federal stimulus. At the state time, the state reduced its spending level for basic education, allowing the federal dollars to make up the difference. 
Now, in the first state budget after the federal stimulus has disappeared, a $500 million reduction in state spending on education is the result of the federal stimulus increasing, and then decreasing, education dollars.
Lawmakers and school districts are left to grapple with the problem.
In many state districts, Education Secretary Ron Tomalis said Monday, the federal stimulus was folded into the general operating costs, creating a hole when the temporary funds vanished.
Since Corbett is unwilling to crank up state spending to make up for the difference, school districts will have to deal with the overall funding reduction by either cutting services or increasing local property taxes. 
Democratic lawmakers slammed Tomalis and Gov. Tom Corbett for reducing education funding from its pre-stimulus levels of $5.8 billion.
But most of that reduction took place in previous budgets, though it was hidden by the federal stimulus funds, and the gap is only now becoming apparent, Tomalis said.
In 2009, the Legislature and then-Gov. Ed Rendell, a Democrat, approved a budget that used about $650 million in federal stimulus money for education, although the state cut spending on education by about $350 million.
As a result, school districts in the state saw more than $300 million in additional dollars, but the state’s cost for education decreased by about $350 million. Lawmakers hid the decrease behind the federal stimulus.
From the perspective of a school district, however, dollars are dollars. And now that the federal money is gone, the reduction in state spending is causing problems, said state Rep. Matt Smith, D-Allegheny.
Some districts followed that guideline, but others did not, and now each one has a different story, said State Rep. Bill Adolph, R-Delaware, chair of the House Appropriations Committee.
“When that stimulus money was appropriated, school districts were informed that it was one-time money,” Adolph said. “Some used it for what it was for and others created some programs, and they are now looking for where the money comes from.”
Some local school district officials said they were never given such specific instructions about how to use the stimulus dollars that were connected to basic education formula. So, unlike other federal money that goes to one-time costs, the stimulus funds in the basic education subsidy were treated like state dollars.
“It was never really described to us in that way,” said Patricia Bader, business manager at East Stroudsburg School District in Monroe County. “I think it was a little disingenuous for them to say that.”
Bader said the district is grateful for any amount of funding from the state and federal levels, but it is taking some time to adjust to the cutbacks.
Tomalis said the department wants to give schools more local flexibility because the largest cost driver for districts is generally labor costs, which are negotiated at the local level.
The Pennsylvania State Education Association, the state’s largest teachers’ union, has been sharply critical of Corbett’s proposed budget and has warned that districts will be forced to increase property taxes.
Part of the confusion also has to do with changes made in how the state will fund basic education this year. Corbett has proposed combining a series of previously-separate line items into a single “Student Achievement Education Block Grant” program, which, the administration said, would give school districts more flexibility in how state dollars are spent at the local level while reducing funding by about $20 million from last year for that collection of line items.