By Eric Boehm | Watchdog.org
If the cops in Seattle want to dig through a city resident’s garbage to look for evidence of a crime, they have to go get a warrant first.
But garbage collectors in Seattle are not only allowed to dig through the trash without a judge’s consent, they’re actually required to do so.
Seattle is on the cutting edge of nanny state-ism with a new citywide ban on throwing any compostable material into the trash, no matter how gross, smelly or disgusting it might be. The city government is serious about this — so serious that they have deputized the trashmen as a sort of secret police who are being ordered to rat on residents’ trash habits to the nannies at Seattle Public Utilities.
If this sounds like an arrangement that violates a whole bunch of amendments to the U.S. Constitution (and the Washington State Constitution too, in the event you’re familiar with it), well, you’re not alone.
The Pacific Legal Foundation, a nonprofit law firm that loves challenging ridiculous government regulations like this one, filed a lawsuit Thursday asking a state judge to shut down the Seattle trash-snooping program.
“While it’s laudable to encourage recycling and composting, the city is going about it in a way that trashes the privacy rights of each and every person in Seattle,” said Brian Hodges, managing attorney for PLF’s Pacific Northwest Center, based in suburban Seattle.
According to the Seattle Times, city officials declined to comment on the lawsuit and said Thursday they were still reviewing it.
The ban on food waste, which we’ve covered in this space before, requires garbage collectors to search through the contents of garbage cans (and you thought being a garbage collector was bad enough already) and to report violations to Seattle Public Utilities, the bureaucratic entity that imposed the ban and will soon begin issuing fines for violations.
The new rules took effect Jan. 1, but the city is graciously allowing for an education period before it begins issuing fines to people who carelessly toss an apple core or a toilet paper tube into the wastebasket.
For now, offending trash bins will have an “educational tag” attached. The lawsuit estimates some 9,000 of those tags were issued between January and April, including two to one of the eight named plaintiffs in the lawsuit.
Those warnings will go away next January when the fines start coming for real.
Single-family homes will face a $1 fine for each instance where compostable material is found in the garbage. Apartment complexes and commercial buildings will see fines of $50 (!!) per instance.
“But wait,” you might be saying. “I put my garbage into an opaque, black bag before I toss it into the can. Surely, I’ll be fine.”
Nope. Seattle Public Utilities is a step ahead of you.
According to training documents obtained by PLF, garbage collectors are being told to enforce the policy with ‘zero tolerance’ and are being taught to remove bags to inspect a garbage can, peer into translucent bags and open torn or untied bags.
“In short, this program calls for massive and persistent snooping on the people of Seattle,” said Hodges. “This is not just objectionable as a matter of policy, it is a flagrant assault on people’s constitutional rights.”
I’d say Seattle officials have thrown the constitution into the garbage — but since it’s printed on paper, they probably know better than that.
I’m sure they remembered to compost it instead.
- Nanny-state state of the week: MD may become first to ban Vaportinis
- Nanny-state city of the week: Minneapolis wants to ban take-out trays
- Skim is in: CT lawmakers want to ban whole milk in day cares
- Nanny state of the week: Fairfax, VA, wants to limit the right to assemble
- Nanny state of the week: SC — and Schumer — for duplicative efforts to ban powdered alcohol
- Nanny of the Week: Virginia hoses down car wash fundraisers
- Nanny of the Week: Even a summertime trip to the beach can’t be nanny-free
- Nanny of the week: Federal authorities think feral cats can read signs
- Nanny of the week: Cambridge wants to ban ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft
- Nanny-stater of the week: NY lawmaker wants to ban photos with tigers
- Nanny-stater of the Week: Who needs cupcakes and candy? Here, have a pencil
- Nanny-stater of the week: Fargo limits kids to less than four shots of juice per day
- Nanny-stater of the week: Wisconsin towns fight repeal of bow ban
- Nanny of the week: No fun in the sun, thanks to Congress and FDA
- Nanny-stater of the week: DOT to ban cell phone use on planes
- Nanny of the week: The out-of-control trend of arresting non-helicopter moms
- Nanny of the Week: Vermont city could ban ‘human activity’
- Nanny of the Week: Mississippi makes bird feeders illegal – by accident
- Nanny of the week: MO town bans breastfeeding near pools
- Nanny of the Week: School bans lip balm, 11 year-old girl fights back
- Watchdog.org blows lid off Vermont’s bake sale brownie ban
- Nanny of the Week: Seattle imposes fine on residents who throw away food
- Nanny of the Week: California bans plastic bags
- Nanny of the week: Maybe this time it will be different for Chicago
- Nanny of the Week: Florida growls at craft breweries’ growlers
- Nanny of the Week: Massachusetts town seeking to ban tobacco faces uprising from residents
- Nanny of the Week: Proposed bans on Thanksgiving Day shopping
- Nanny of the week: U.S. government bans ‘Comfyballs’ underwear
- Nanny of the Week: Better take down those holiday decorations
- Nanny of the week: Towns ban sledding
- Nanny of the Week: New York City plans to ban out-of-state cars
- Nanny of the Week: Snow-shoveling teens get in trouble with the law
- Nanny of the Week: Get caught wearing yoga pants three times, go to jail for life
- Nanny of the Week: Georgia lawmaker wants to ban mermaids, werewolves, other fictional creatures from real life
- Nanny State of the Week: Endangering manatees in Florida
- Nanny of the Week: Christie caves to protectionist gravestone proposal in N.J.
- Nanny of the Week: Don’t mix beer and ice cream – because of the children
- Nanny of the Week: Is the minimum wage a nanny state policy?
- Nanny of the Week: Republican in NY backs cat declawing ban
- Nanny of the Week: NJ continues ban on self-serve gasoline, because sometimes it snows
- Nanny of the Week: Bernie Sanders is coming for your deodorant
- Nanny of the Week: Will babies confuse beer for their binkies?
- Nanny of the Week: Weeds will prevail in Maryland lawn care ban
- Nanny State of the Week: FDA bans trans-fats
- Nanny State of the Week: L.A. plans to jail unlicensed street vendors
- Nanny ST8 of the Week: Anti-government messages not allowed on license plates
- Nanny State of the Week: Helicopters, horses and New York City
- Nanny State of the Week: Lawsuit challenges Seattle trash snooping
- Nanny State of the Week: Town officials mandate mowing
- Nanny State of the Week: Florida county sends environmental specialist to investigate BBQ
- Nanny State: Despite menu nannies, Americans still fat!
- Nanny State of the Week: New York City’s ban on Styrofoam hurts businesses, consumers
- Nanny State of the Week: Colorado Springs may ban sitting in public places
- Nanny State of the Week: New York’s soda ban could be back — but for kids only
- Nanny State of the Week: D.C. flexing licensing muscles at personal trainers
- Nanny State of the Week: Hammock bans mean no hanging out on college campuses
- Nanny State of the Week: County can use same lawn treatments it banned residents from using
- Nanny State of the Week: Pols want to ban daily fantasy sports
- Nanny State of the Week: Bay Area bureaucrats ban fireplaces, wood stoves
- Nanny State of the Week: Halloween for the politically correct only
- Nanny State of the Week: Governments lag behind the public on orca captivity ban
- Nanny State of the Week: New York might accidentally ban makeup
- Nanny State of the Week: California could be first state to apply no-fly list to guns
- Nanny State of the Week: University may block social media app in futile effort to combat racism
- Nanny State of the Week: City fines residents for chipped paint, mismatched curtains
- Nanny State of the Week: No Christmas in Bethlehem this year
- Nanny State of the Week: Connecticut may outlaw smoking in many cars
- Nanny State of the Week: Town inspection checks whether you cleaned your toilet
- Nanny State of the Week: Minnesota men facing felony charges for selling beer
- Nanny State of the Week: City rewrites law to block theater from getting liquor license
- Nanny State of the Week: FDA goes beyond the pale, prepares to ban teen tanning
- Nanny State of the Week: Charleston’s storied history is off-limits to the unlicensed
- Nanny State of the Week: Feds marketing food stamps with bingo games, TV ads
- Nanny State of the Week: No sipping and selling for Alabama winemakers
- Nanny State of the Week: Jail time for texting while walking in New Jersey
- Nanny State of the Week: In time for Opening Day, cities ban chewing tobacco at ballparks
- Nanny State of the Week: Feds send LSD Ale on a long, strange trip
- Nanny State of the Week: Happy Tax Day! Now get ready to pay more to file
- Nanny State of the Week: A state license for breast-feeding advice?
- Nanny State of the Week: School officials bully kids with ban on skinny jeans
- Nanny State of the Week: FDA fries family’s potato chip business with new cooking oil mandates
- Nanny State of the Week: CFPB knows what is best for your personal finances
- Nanny State of the Week: City cracks down on crawfish boils after mayor’s aide complains
- Nanny State of the Week: Florida couple still fighting for their vegetable garden
- Nanny State of the Week: State lawmakers to decide where you can get an Uber in Boston