In many states, teens are required to get parental permission before they can climb inside an indoor tanning bed.
Soon, even parental permission might not be enough. The federal government is poised to let nannyism override parental consent.
The Food and Drug Administration recently unveiled new rules for indoor tanning that would ban anyone under the age of 18 from using a tanning bed. The FDA says the new rules are part of a commitment to “protecting public health by informing consumers about the risks of indoor tanning.”
Someone needs to get the bureaucrats at the FDA a dictionary, because they’re using the word “informing” incorrectly.
“Informing consumers” means giving them information – like explaining how science shows a connection between excessive indoor tanning and higher risks of skin cancer – but then trusting informed consumers to consider that risk and make their own decisions.
It could also mean taking steps to ensure that some people, like teens, are fully aware of the risks by getting their parents involved.
Telling someone they are not allowed to do something is not “informing” them of anything, except perhaps the extent to which the federal government wants to stick its nose into their everyday lives.
“These proposed rules are meant to help adults make their decisions based on truthful information and to ensure manufacturers and tanning facilities take additional steps to improve the safety of these devices,” says the FDA.
But those same adults are apparently incapable of making that same decision when their children are involved. That’s the government’s job, apparently.
Tanning is big business in the United States, and young people make up a substantial portion of tanning salons’ customers. About 20 percent of adults in the U.S. tan at least once a year, but as much as 35 percent of American teens do, according to data from the National Institutes of Health.
Should parents be aware of the potential dangers of indoor tanning before letting their children tan? Absolutely.
But should government have the power to overrule parents on the issue of tanning (or plenty of other issues, come to think of it)? Nope.
Let’s not pretend there aren’t risks that come with tanning – whether done artificially or outside under the blazing sun the way God intended. According to the American Academy of Dermatology, those who have been exposed to radiation from indoor tanning are 59 percent more likely to develop melanoma than those who have never tanned indoors.
But there are benefits, too, beyond the vanity of not looking like a ghost for six months of the year. Tanning helps eliminate acne, and getting a base tan before hitting the beach can help protect against serious sunburn.
The federal government knows this. It funded research by the National Institutes of Health that found both risks and rewards to indoor tanning.
“Sun exposure is beneficial in moderation, but can be harmful in excess. Sun exposure guidance should be tailored to the individual patient,” researchers for the NIH concluded.
Government policies leave no room for moderation, or for individuals to tailor their actions to their own individual needs.
When the government nannies decide to make something mandatory or illegal, there is no middle ground.
- Nanny-state state of the week: MD may become first to ban Vaportinis
- Nanny-state city of the week: Minneapolis wants to ban take-out trays
- Skim is in: CT lawmakers want to ban whole milk in day cares
- Nanny state of the week: Fairfax, VA, wants to limit the right to assemble
- Nanny state of the week: SC — and Schumer — for duplicative efforts to ban powdered alcohol
- Nanny of the Week: Virginia hoses down car wash fundraisers
- Nanny of the Week: Even a summertime trip to the beach can’t be nanny-free
- Nanny of the week: Federal authorities think feral cats can read signs
- Nanny of the week: Cambridge wants to ban ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft
- Nanny-stater of the week: NY lawmaker wants to ban photos with tigers
- Nanny-stater of the Week: Who needs cupcakes and candy? Here, have a pencil
- Nanny-stater of the week: Fargo limits kids to less than four shots of juice per day
- Nanny-stater of the week: Wisconsin towns fight repeal of bow ban
- Nanny of the week: No fun in the sun, thanks to Congress and FDA
- Nanny-stater of the week: DOT to ban cell phone use on planes
- Nanny of the week: The out-of-control trend of arresting non-helicopter moms
- Nanny of the Week: Vermont city could ban ‘human activity’
- Nanny of the Week: Mississippi makes bird feeders illegal – by accident
- Nanny of the week: MO town bans breastfeeding near pools
- Nanny of the Week: School bans lip balm, 11 year-old girl fights back
- Watchdog.org blows lid off Vermont’s bake sale brownie ban
- Nanny of the Week: Seattle imposes fine on residents who throw away food
- Nanny of the Week: California bans plastic bags
- Nanny of the week: Maybe this time it will be different for Chicago
- Nanny of the Week: Florida growls at craft breweries’ growlers
- Nanny of the Week: Massachusetts town seeking to ban tobacco faces uprising from residents
- Nanny of the Week: Proposed bans on Thanksgiving Day shopping
- Nanny of the week: U.S. government bans ‘Comfyballs’ underwear
- Nanny of the Week: Better take down those holiday decorations
- Nanny of the week: Towns ban sledding
- Nanny of the Week: New York City plans to ban out-of-state cars
- Nanny of the Week: Snow-shoveling teens get in trouble with the law
- Nanny of the Week: Get caught wearing yoga pants three times, go to jail for life
- Nanny of the Week: Georgia lawmaker wants to ban mermaids, werewolves, other fictional creatures from real life
- Nanny State of the Week: Endangering manatees in Florida
- Nanny of the Week: Christie caves to protectionist gravestone proposal in N.J.
- Nanny of the Week: Don’t mix beer and ice cream – because of the children
- Nanny of the Week: Is the minimum wage a nanny state policy?
- Nanny of the Week: Republican in NY backs cat declawing ban
- Nanny of the Week: NJ continues ban on self-serve gasoline, because sometimes it snows
- Nanny of the Week: Bernie Sanders is coming for your deodorant
- Nanny of the Week: Will babies confuse beer for their binkies?
- Nanny of the Week: Weeds will prevail in Maryland lawn care ban
- Nanny State of the Week: FDA bans trans-fats
- Nanny State of the Week: L.A. plans to jail unlicensed street vendors
- Nanny ST8 of the Week: Anti-government messages not allowed on license plates
- Nanny State of the Week: Helicopters, horses and New York City
- Nanny State of the Week: Lawsuit challenges Seattle trash snooping
- Nanny State of the Week: Town officials mandate mowing
- Nanny State of the Week: Florida county sends environmental specialist to investigate BBQ
- Nanny State: Despite menu nannies, Americans still fat!
- Nanny State of the Week: New York City’s ban on Styrofoam hurts businesses, consumers
- Nanny State of the Week: Colorado Springs may ban sitting in public places
- Nanny State of the Week: New York’s soda ban could be back — but for kids only
- Nanny State of the Week: D.C. flexing licensing muscles at personal trainers
- Nanny State of the Week: Hammock bans mean no hanging out on college campuses
- Nanny State of the Week: County can use same lawn treatments it banned residents from using
- Nanny State of the Week: Pols want to ban daily fantasy sports
- Nanny State of the Week: Bay Area bureaucrats ban fireplaces, wood stoves
- Nanny State of the Week: Halloween for the politically correct only
- Nanny State of the Week: Governments lag behind the public on orca captivity ban
- Nanny State of the Week: New York might accidentally ban makeup
- Nanny State of the Week: California could be first state to apply no-fly list to guns
- Nanny State of the Week: University may block social media app in futile effort to combat racism
- Nanny State of the Week: City fines residents for chipped paint, mismatched curtains
- Nanny State of the Week: No Christmas in Bethlehem this year
- Nanny State of the Week: Connecticut may outlaw smoking in many cars
- Nanny State of the Week: Town inspection checks whether you cleaned your toilet
- Nanny State of the Week: Minnesota men facing felony charges for selling beer
- Nanny State of the Week: City rewrites law to block theater from getting liquor license
- Nanny State of the Week: FDA goes beyond the pale, prepares to ban teen tanning
- Nanny State of the Week: Charleston’s storied history is off-limits to the unlicensed
- Nanny State of the Week: Feds marketing food stamps with bingo games, TV ads
- Nanny State of the Week: No sipping and selling for Alabama winemakers
- Nanny State of the Week: Jail time for texting while walking in New Jersey
- Nanny State of the Week: In time for Opening Day, cities ban chewing tobacco at ballparks
- Nanny State of the Week: Feds send LSD Ale on a long, strange trip
- Nanny State of the Week: Happy Tax Day! Now get ready to pay more to file
- Nanny State of the Week: A state license for breast-feeding advice?
- Nanny State of the Week: School officials bully kids with ban on skinny jeans
- Nanny State of the Week: FDA fries family’s potato chip business with new cooking oil mandates
- Nanny State of the Week: CFPB knows what is best for your personal finances
- Nanny State of the Week: City cracks down on crawfish boils after mayor’s aide complains
- Nanny State of the Week: Florida couple still fighting for their vegetable garden