Home  >  Montana  >  MT: Tester could help block Obama’s tax hike plan

MT: Tester could help block Obama’s tax hike plan

By   /   July 10, 2012  /   1 Comment

President Obama wants to hike taxes, but U.S. Sen. Jon Tester could block the plan.

By Dustin Hurst ǀ Watchdog.org

HELENA — As President Barack Obama seeks tax hikes for Americans and businesses making more than $250,000, one Montana lawmaker might be in the best position to stop the deal.

The Wall Street Journal wrote Monday that U.S. Sen. Jon Tester is among a handful of vulnerable Democratic senators who could balk on the tax-hike plan.

Tester, along with U.S. Sens. Joe Manchin, D-WVa.; Claire McCaskill D-Mo.; Bill Nelson, D-Fla.; Ben Nelson, D-Neb.; and Jim Webb, D-Va.; could ultimately decide the tax hike debate. Each of these Democrats is facing a tough election challenge and may want to avoid catching heat for raising taxes.

Obama’s plan would keep in place tax rates instituted by President George W. Bush for those making less than $250,000 annually. People making more than that, including an estimated 900,000 small businesses falling under the plan, would see their rates go up.

The new Obama proposal is part of his quest to force wealthier Americans to pay more, with the president saying they need to pay their fair share. “That’s why I believe it’s time for the tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, including myself, to expire,” Obama said at a Monday news conference.

But vulnerable Democrats are wary of the plan. The Wall Street Journal notes Tester and Manchin advocate not for a temporary extension of the Bush tax cuts, but rather total reform of the nation’s tax code. The two push for at least partial institution of the Bowles-Simpson tax plan, which would lower tax rates but close loopholes.

Tester supports large-scale tax reform over short-term solutions.

“I would much prefer dealing with the tax code, with all the expenditures, in a bigger package similar to the Simpson-Bowles (deficit reduction) proposal,” Tester told The Hill. “If we can do that and we can roll out a big package that is significant, then we can do something with the tax rate from a reforming-it standpoint and do some things that really get our deficit and debt under control.”

The president’s package is likely dead, though, as the Republican-controlled U.S. House is unlikely to go along with the plan. The House will vote later this week on extending the Bush tax cuts for a year to all income earners, though that plan is unlikely to win over the Democrat-controlled U.S. Senate.

Tester’s November foe, GOP U.S. Rep. Denny Rehberg, will likely support the one-year tax cut extension. Rehberg supports the cuts and voted to make them permanent in 2002.

Please, feel free to "steal our stuff"! Just remember to credit Watchdog.org. Find out more

Dustin Hurst

  • jeanette wolf

    Dear Senator Tester, I am concerned that you may vote against Pres. Obamas tax plan. It seems to me, at the rate congress does anything, it would be better to do this plan for the extention and deal with the simson bowles plan you suggested after the election. I just hope you arent doing it because you are afraid it will affect the outcome of your election. I have been backing you all along it doesnt seem like something you would bend to.
    I work for a small Mt. business that hires for a four month period and then odd days thru the year. The owners do quite well but not sure of annual income. Of course they would like a tax break.but that is not what keeps them from hiring new workers. I never hear them complaining about that just talk about in a general way. What decision they make to hire more workers is not the tax but how much product they can sell! They have six employees and the two owners. As long as six workers can do the work that sells what they want they wont hire more…It seems to me that it isnt companies that hire people it is the customers that allows the company to hire more workers…and they will work the workers as much as they can before they hire more..
    If people dont have money (job) then the company doesnt make money to hire more workers.
    Seems to me you and all in Washington are counting on companies to hire when you should be concentrating on getting people to work…Dont think the big companies are going to do anything about hiring. Big companies have enough money right now to sit it out. Dont feel sorry for those over 250,000…worry more about all the small businesses in Mt. that could use the the helpl.
    thanks for listening
    J.