MADISON, Wis. – Federal investigators have posted online the summary of their probe into a scandal-plagued Madison Social Security hearing office.
There’s not much in the brief report that Wisconsin Watchdog hasn’t previously reported.
What remains unanswered is why federal prosecutors declined to bring charges for what appears to be criminal conduct.
While the Social Security Administration’s Office of the Inspector General found violations of the law, the U.S. attorney’s office for the Western District of Wisconsin has inexplicably declined prosecution. The U.S. attorney’s office has not returned requests for comment.
The summary, posted at the OIG website, breaks down the major findings of the investigation.
- Hiring decisions were largely unchecked, leaving the management official (Hearing Office Director Laura Hodorowicz) free to populate the office with friends and family members of current employees, increasing perceptions of favoritism and diminishing both employee morale and focus on the agency’s public service mission.
- Hiring practices, which often included the manipulation of vacancy announcements to achieve a desired end, likely violated merit system principles resulting in prohibited personnel practices.
- No appointments violated Title 5 veterans preferences, though one stated end was to avoid hiring veterans.
- Management officials’ time and attendance practices violated both law and regulation, and set a tone for the office that misconduct by certain employees would be tolerated, and in some instances, encouraged.
- The presence of racist and sexist written comments in hearing notes was known to many employees and managers in the office for years and went unaddressed; however, we did not find evidence of any systemic biases in written decisions involving protected groups.
Federal investigators examined sexual harassment and other misconduct allegations against Administrative Law Judge John Pleuss.
Pleuss in his notes to legal assistants described claimants as “attractive,” “innocent-looking,” “buxom.” In one case, he noted a “young, white (woman)”appearing before him “looks like a man.”
“Obese, young, white (female) skimpy black top,” he wrote of another claimant.
“Very black, African looking (female),” the judge wrote, and parenthetically he added,“(actually a gorilla-like appearance).”
Pleuss retired at the end of the year, still eligible for a pension and a suite of federal benefits.
The Inspector General has yet to comment on the investigation. Full reports are not publicly available because they “contain sensitive confidential information,” OIG notes in its summary.
That the investigation found “no evidence of any systemic biases in written decisions involving protected groups” raises some questions.
Decisions on Social Security disability claims are written by ODAR attorneys in the office, not the judge. Could the judge’s comments bias the decision writers?
Some attorneys representing disability claimants have sought appeals of Pleuss’ cases.
As Wisconsin Watchdog reported last week, an OIG “fact sheet” on the investigation noted Hodorowicz used official leave and sick leave to gamble at an area casino, while a group supervisor got paid a full day’s wage to watch Green Bay Packer’s football game.
An OIG report sent to U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Oshkosh, noted that whistleblowers in the Madison ODAR hearing office experienced adverse treatment after making whistleblower disclosures. The Social Security Administration has denied any retaliation.
The OIG concluded that, “while we did not substantiate any clear instances of reprisal against [the whistleblowers], who disclosed the malfeasance in the Madison (Hearing Office) at great personal risk, we note that both of them were held to strict interpretations of all agency policies, while other favored employees … were not,” according to a letter Johnson sent to SSA Acting Commissioner Nancy Berryhill.
The senator, chairman of the Senate committee that has opened an inquiry into allegations of corruption and retaliation at the Madison ODAR, is giving the agency until 5 p.m. Monday to provide documents requested by the committee.
Social Security Administration officials repeatedly have declined to comment on personnel matters.
The Office of the Special Counsel has an open investigation into whistleblower allegations. OIG sent its report to OSC for “legal determinations related to reprisal and prohibited personnel practices.”
“Prosecution was declined,” the Inspector General stated. “We sent our report to SSA officials for their determination of administrative actions.”
- Deadly Delay: Whistleblower alleges misconduct, incompetence in Social Security office
- Johnson seeks answers to Social Security whistleblower’s charges
- Social Security disability program has plenty of problems elsewhere
- Social Security whistleblower placed on administrative leave
- Social Security disability agency has history of punishing whistleblowers
- Senator to Social Security Administration official: ‘I would say the system is rigged’
- Whistleblower: ‘I want to do my work without fear of retaliation’
- Social Security whistleblowers ‘coming out of the woodwork’
- Social Security whistleblower suspended after going public with complaints
- Social Security whistleblower questioned by investigators after going public
- Social Security whistleblower now faces firing
- Social Security officials not answering questions about whistleblower retaliation
- ‘Culture of corruption and cover-up’ alleged in Madison Social Security office
- Ron Johnson: We’re tracking down abuse allegations in Social Security agency
- Senate committee presses for answers from troubled Social Security Administration
- Sources: Social Security judge suspended in wake of Madison scandal
- Attorney seeks appeal of decisions by Social Security judge accused of ‘sexy’ comments
- Social Security appeals judge pleads guilty to retaliation charge
- More retaliation despite investigation, Social Security office sources say
- Openly gay whistleblower at Social Security office claims intimidation, retaliation
- Wheels of justice turn frustratingly slow for Social Security whistleblowers
- Baldwin joins Johnson in calling for ‘immediate action’ on Social Security misconduct claims
- Documents: Social Security judge wrote claimant was ‘rode hard and put away wet’
- Social Security judge investigated for harassment heading back to hearings
- Social Security judge accused of misconduct refuses to step aside, sources say
- Whistleblower at scandal-plagued Social Security office seeks restraining order against manager
- Whistleblower report alleges widespread waste, fraud, abuse at Social Security office
- Sen. Johnson to Social Security commissioner: Retaliation will not be tolerated
- Baldwin warns Social Security Administration not to retaliate
- Social Security Administration fires whistleblower
- Who is protecting Social Security whistleblowers?
- Sources: Social Security judge accused of racial, sexual remarks removed from hearings
- Social Security office director removed from Madison facility, sources say
- Senate committee probe into Social Security whistleblower retaliation continues
- Madison Social Security office like ‘giant dysfunctional family,’ source says
- Damage spreads at scandal-plagued Social Security office
- Fired Social Security whistleblower gets no help from federal whistleblower protector
- One month later, Social Security whistleblower still without job, pay, answers
- Federal agents stepping up investigation into troubled Social Security offices
- Investigation into troubled Social Security offices in a ‘holding pattern’
- Recent weeks bring shake-up at scandal-plagued Social Security offices
- Top judges resign at troubled Social Security Chicago headquarters
- Social Security chief judge retiring amid cloud of scandal
- Troubled Social Security disability claims agency promotes ‘positive organization culture’
- Senate inquiry into scandal-plagued Social Security offices plods along
- Social Security whistleblower: ‘Everything has been compromised’
- Sources: Social Security judge accused of sexual harassment removed from Madison office
- Fired Social Security whistleblower won’t be taking whistleblower protection training
- Letter: Social Security judge under fire granted power to decide
- Sources: Social Security judge accused of deciding cases on sex appeal retires
- Johnson seeks GAO review of alleged Social Security ‘shell game’
- Social Security judge demanded $65,000 expanded bathrooms
- Investigation finds abuse, law-breaking, no retaliation at Madison Social Security office
- Report: Social Security managers gambled, watched Packers at Lambeau on taxpayer dime
- Inspector General releases major findings of probe into troubled Social Security office
- Social Security whistleblower waiting for answers in privacy breach case
- A whistleblower’s story: Paying the price for shining a light
- Fired SSA employee featured in Watchdog investigation is ‘Whistleblower of the Year’
- Social Security whistleblower calls out agency, media in receiving award from journalists
- SSA whistleblowers ask, where’s the justice?
- Probes into troubled Social Security offices crawling along