Home  >  Illinois  >  Quinn: Pension reform ‘a race against the clock’

Quinn: Pension reform ‘a race against the clock’

By   /   June 1, 2012  /   5 Comments

By Jayette Bolinski | Illinois Statehouse News

SPRINGFIELD — Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn will meet with the state’s four legislative leaders next week to work out differences on a pension reform effort that failed to make it out of the General Assembly before its deadline Thursday.

It is unclear when, exactly, all lawmakers will be called back here for a special summer session to approve the reform legislation. Quinn said action must be swift, as a possible downgrade of the state’s credit rating is at stake.

“We’ve got to accomplish this mission, and we don’t have a lot of time to do it. It is a race against the clock. I’m going to make that crystal clear to the legislative leaders next week,” said Quinn, who took questions Friday from reporters here for about 15 minutes. “We must forge an agreement. I think we have the elements, we’re very close, but we’re not there yet.”

Before adjourning from the legislative session — the House late Thursday and the Senate early Friday — lawmakers did approve gambling expansion and a spending plan for next fiscal year. But they failed to reform the state’s failing public pension system — an issue that was supposed to be Job No. 1 for members of both chambers.

Quinn previously referred to gaming expansion as a “shiny object” that lawmakers should ignore, in favor of dealing with the pension crisis.

The major sticking point for lawmakers, which caused a late and unexpected collapse of the pension reform effort Wednesday night, is the issue of whether some pension liability should be shifted to local government, such as school districts, instead of the state picking up those costs.

House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago, supported the cost shift, while Republicans, including House Minority Leader Rep. Tom Cross, R-Oswego, objected to the shift, saying it would result in tax increases.

Wednesday night, just as the House was preparing to adjourn, Madigan announced he had spoken with Quinn and learned that the governor, like many Republicans, did not favor shifting the cost, so Madigan turned over sponsorship of the legislation to Cross.

Madigan then refused to support the measure, which caused enough other lawmakers to abandon support the measure could not pass.

Quinn said both parties, in both legislative chambers, agree on the issue of accountability, but the question is how to implement that accountability. Lawmakers have to find common ground between both reform proposals.

“All of us acknowledge the core principle that those units of government cannot be free riders. They must have a stake in the cost of their employees’ retirement. They can’t be able to negotiate the contract and then hand the bill off to someone else,” Quinn said.

“The principle is how do we implement that accountability for those units of government. There’s disagreement on that. I think that can be negotiated. I think folks can come together and come up with a plan.”

Regarding gambling expansion, Quinn would not say if he intends to veto legislation to create five new casinos in Illinois, as well as allow slot machines at horse-racing tracks. Quinn responded only that he wants gambing in Illinois to have ethical oversight, integrity and a lockdown on campaign money from gambling interests.

Last year, Quinn threatened to veto similar gambling expansion legislation that passed the General Assembly. Lawmakers, however, did not send the expansion bill to the governor.

“The people of Illinois want to have integrity in their government from top to bottom. That’s why we’re here. We’re here to make sure things are done right and cleaned up. So we’re not going to go in the direction of any other place than integrity,” Quinn said Friday.

Jayette Bolinski can be reached at jayette.bolinski@franklincenterhq.org.

Please, feel free to "steal our stuff"! Just remember to credit Watchdog.org. Find out more

Admin

  • Artamist

    Take the State Retires out of the budget. it is not right to take away what you promised and they counted on.

  • Pingback: Quinn: Pension reform ‘a race against the clock’ « The Blog Peoria Project

  • Alan Pigg

    The state of Illinois should get there priority’s right. How can you

    take away pension benefits and cost of living raises from retires who

    earned it by serving the state of Illinois and on the other hand keep

    giving out new money to other interest groups. Case in point SIU

    extends health benefits to domestic partners . How insane it is for

    the state to now give benefits to people who have never worked for the

    state

    and then take it away from the workers and retires. I’m all for

    everyone getting free health insurance but not on the backs of those

    who worked for it. Look over the years at all the new spending

    programs the state took on when they should have been paying into the

    pensions. Its not that the state of il does not

    or did not have the money to pay there promised share into the pension

    plan it was there Choice. Now they want to take promised benefits away

    from the very people who worked for the state. When I retired the

    State said

    we will pay 5 percent of your heath care insurance for every year you

    worked. If you worked 10 years they paid 50 percent but if you worked

    20 plus years it was free. How can they now take that benefit away.

    There have been many tricks the state and the school systems have done

    over the years to give special people better retirement benefits and

    that was wrong and still is. Case in point Look at the retirement

    packages over the last few

    years from John A Logan and Carterville Teachers Ret Sys

    Mees, Robert L Carterville CUSD

    5 $69,604.38 10/1/2005 40.671 $87,555.60

    State Universities Mees, Robert L John A Logan

    College $171,213.72 10/1/2005 11.1926 $62,498.04

    The schools and University’s give bonuses the last years to raise

    there retirement that the state has to pay. Now that’s not fair. I’m

    sure if you looked into these end of year deals you would find out

    whats going on. The 2 people I cited above

    may not have been part of the end of year bonuses as I cannot find

    that information . I just pulled them up as High retirement dollar

    people.

    The majority of state of Il pension people have pensions in the 20 to

    50 thousand dollar range. They worked for the state to get good

    benefits upon retirement that was the deal.

    Every dollar that is taken away from the retires is less dollars they

    can spend in the community. So when the state says they save 1 billion

    or more on the backs of the retires it all coming out of the money

    that the retires spend in there community’s. This will result

    in business failures thru-out the southern region of Il as we have a

    large concentration of retires.

    Medicaid is another subject

    take these examples How do I get MPE?

    You must go to an MPE provider. The MPE provider will decide if you

    can get MPE. To get MPE, the provider must verify that you are

    pregnant and you must tell the provider your family’s gross monthly

    income. If you are pregnant and meet the income requirements for MPE,

    you can get MPE.

    You do not have to be a citizen or a legal immigrant to get MPE.

    You do not have to have a Social Security number to get MPE.

    Did you read the part where you do not have be a citizen or a legal

    immigrant to get Moms and babies program and that you just tell the

    provider your family’s gross monthly income NOT VERIFY.

    heres the benefits Moms & Babies is a program for pregnant women and

    their babies. Moms & Babies pays for both outpatient and inpatient

    hospital services for women while they are pregnant, and for 60 days

    after the baby is born. It also pays for services to babies for the

    first year of the baby’s life, if the mother is covered by Moms &

    Babies when the baby is born. There are no co-payments or premiums in

    Moms & Babies.

    And did you know that you can make $46104.00 dollar for a family of 4

    and get the above benefit FREE>>>>>>>>>>>>

    Im all for everyone getting free medical etc but I do not feel its

    fail to take INSURANCE away from the people that worked all there

    lives for it and earned it and give it non citizens and Illegal

    people that are not even citizens of the great state of ILLINOIS. Why

    should we give free insurance to someone that makes 46104 dollar s

    year..

    Then theirs Family Care program there income guideline says a family

    of 4 can make 61944 dollars and receive benefits.

    then there THE ALL KIDS PROGRAM

    The All Kids program offers many Illinois children comprehensive

    healthcare that includes doctors visits, hospital stays, prescription

    drugs, vision care, dental care and medical devices like eyeglasses

    and asthma inhalers. Some families pay monthly premiums for the

    coverage, but rates for middle-income families are significantly lower

    than they are on the private market. For instance, a family of four

    that earns between $45,000 and $67,000 a year pays a $40 monthly

    premium per child, and a $10 co-pay per physician visit.

    YES Make up to 67000 dollars and your eligible for this one.

    To some it up I wish everyone in the state of Illinois could get free

    heath insurance free food and anything else they want IF THE STATE CAN

    AFFORD TO GIVE IT AWAY. BUT DON’T TAKE AWAY THE BENEFITS, AND HARD

    EARNED RETIREMENT OF THOSE THAT CHOSE TO WORK FOR THEM BENEFITS THAT’S

    JUST NOT RIGHT.

  • http://capitolfax.com dmk

    Blackmail has been defined in the broad sense to mean “compelling someone to act against their will or gaining or attempting to gain something of value.”

    They call this choice. I call it blackmail.

  • http://capitolfax.com dmk

    Execuse me citizens of Illinois, why on earth are we allowing our lawmakers and Govenor waste millions of money on hearings when other states have already declared it is unconstituional to remove health insurance from the retirement systems since they promised in writing if I may add that we would be provided free insurance if we work 20 years or plus.

    See below :

    Health benefits for government retirees may not be eliminated if state and local governments had clearly promised workers those benefits, the California Supreme Court ruled in an Orange County case Monday.

    The unanimous ruling is expected to make it more difficult for state and local governments to shave costs by cutting health benefits to retirees if elected officials in previous years made it clear that those benefits would last a lifetime.