Home  >  Nebraska  >  Lincoln council denies Sam’s Club liquor license to send message to Wal-Mart

Lincoln council denies Sam’s Club liquor license to send message to Wal-Mart

By   /   July 23, 2012  /   7 Comments

The Lincoln City Council voted today to deny Sam’s Club a liquor license for its future store in southeast Lincoln to express its displeasure with Wal-Mart’s plans to build a new store in southwest Lincoln, despite vehement opposition in the neighborhood.

Councilman Jon Camp suggested the council vote no on the liquor license application to “send a message” to the retailing giant that city leaders would like them to listen to neighbors’ concerns about the Supercenter planned at 27th Street and Grainger Parkway.

His motion passed 5-2, with only Councilmen Gene Carroll and Adam Hornung voting against it. Council members Camp, Jonathan Cook, DiAnna Schimek, Doug Emery and Carl Eskridge voted to deny the license.

Carroll said it was unfair to hold the liquor license hostage when people have been anticipating the Sam’s Club store for a long time. It will be Lincoln’s second Sam’s. Carroll said a “no” vote would send a poor message.

Cook said the company has not been as sensitive to neighbors’ concerns as the council would like, and the council’s vote is only advisory – a state liquor board makes the final decision.

Hornung said the Sam’s Club liquor license has nothing to do with Wal-Mart’s unpopular plans for a new store on the other side of town. He said it was an obscure, underhanded way of expressing displeasure with Wal-Mart.

In June, hundreds of Lincoln residents turned out for a meeting with Wal-Mart representatives to express their unhappiness about the store, which they fear will bring too much traffic, noise and runoff to their neighborhood.

Reported by Deena Winter, deena@nebraskawatchdog.org.

By: TwitterButtons.com

To sign up for free e-mail updates Nebraska Watchdog, click here.

Please, feel free to "steal our stuff"! Just remember to credit Watchdog.org. Find out more

Deena Winter

  • http://gerardharbison.blogspot.com Gerard Harbison

    This is probably illegal. Liquor license applications are supposed to be decided on their merits, and not used to pursue vendettas. If Walmart has any sense, they’ll sue.

  • Fletch

    One has nothing to do with the other. Like Walmart cares about the message from the City Council. They come off looking sooooo petty.

  • SoWhat???

    A bunch of liberals representing the most liberal city in NE trying to stand in the way of private enterprise because established retailers don’t want to compete against the lowest cost retailer. The liberals hate WalMart because they aren’t unionized and don’t pay their people more than they are worth. More of Lincolngrad living up to its anti-business reputation.

  • toddd

    Gerard,

    Tell that to that unfortunate guy who was trying to open that tacky nightclub on 17th and O. (or that Lazlo’s guy who got one recently despite three DUIs in a year)

    But yes, I agree with you, frankly the liquor laws in this city are insane, and the petty way’s they’re changed for some and not others is even worse.

    There are examples too numerous to mention, restaurants who could not get licenses because of zoning or silly laws about distances to children.
    There are businesses that struggled without being able to sell only to have the city award one to a competitor building close by as incentive for construction.

  • James

    More anti WalMart people. If it were a Target of Baker’s on the other side of town, people would not care. Yes, WalMart is not as clean, but I have seen some unclean Target’s as well.

  • Patrick

    Y’all hit right on the head. Pros hate Wal-Mart means Cons love Walmart. I’ll be looking for your pictures on the next update of http://www.peopleofwalmart.com

  • http://fred5.myopenid.com/ fred5

    ..