Home  >  Nebraska  >  Omaha School Board President on Shaky Ground

Omaha School Board President on Shaky Ground

By   /   July 31, 2012  /   6 Comments

Based on comments made at Monday’s stormy meeting of the Omaha School Board, Freddie Gray has a 50-50 chance of remaining board president. 

By Nebraska Watchdog’s count it’s currently 6-4 in favor of Gray with two votes undecided.

It appears the 12 member board will vote on Gray’s future next Monday.

According to published reports in the Omaha World-Herald, Gray and OPS’ attorney apparently withheld information about the sexy emails that led to the resignation of superintendent-to-be Nancy Sebring.

During yesterday’s meeting, before the board voted to name retired Ralston superintendent Virginia Moon as OPS’s interim superintendent, board members spoke one-by-one about Gray’s handling of the Sebring saga.

Gray told the board, “I chose to limit what information was released to board members because of the concern that at some point the board might have to terminate Dr. Sebring’s contract.”

Some board members agreed with Gray’s handling of the issue, some did not (see video below) including board member Sandra Jensen, the board’s former president. 

According to Jensen—who issued the most damning comments—she was told by Gray and the board’s attorney that no information about Sebring was being withheld.

“I was told no, I was told absolutely not…I am concerned,” said Jensen. 

Some spoke longer than others and when the talking was done the votes, which could be in for a variety of twists and turns before the final tally is taken, looked like this:

For Gray: Bambi Bartek, Marian Fey, Nancy Huston, Mary Morrissey, Barbara Velazquez and Gray.

Against Gray: Kersten Borer, Jensen, Nancy Kratke and Justin Wayne.

Undecided: Mary Ellen Dricke and Shirley Tyree.

Reported by Joe Jordan, joe@nebraskawatchdog.org

Editor’s note: to subscribe to News Updates from Nebraska Watchdog at no cost, click here


YouTube

 

 

 

 

Please, feel free to "steal our stuff"! Just remember to credit Watchdog.org. Find out more

Joe Jordan

  • Kevin

    Why withhold information? In any candidate selection process, any information that shows the character of the individual is needed. Gray is inept. She must go. As for her interfering husband, he needs to go as well.

  • B2

    Is Freddie related to Elena Kagan? The fact that Gray doesn’t recuse herself from this vote reveals her true character. See a pattern? She needs to go, and her eliist self-serving husband Bennie as well!

  • Jazzee

    I second that Mrs Gray must go and old Ben is so arrogant and out of control he needs to be replaced. Her explanation didn’t hold water. We have seen over and over how we as taxpayers are treated only want our money other than that sit down and shut up

  • Jim J. Enright

    Gray has done good things, such as coming out for an outside superintedent and voting to question OPS kids about sex andviolence. She also supported a methodical and very open superintendent search. Who could have predicted that Nancy Sebring would have gone goofy over some younger man? However Gray made serious mistakes in this cover-up and lies, and should apologize and vow never to let this type of thing happen again. If she tries to justify her actions, then she should be replaced as board president. the OPS lawyer needs to go elsewhere, period. She gave terrible advice to Gray.

  • Jimjenright

    Freddie Gray should be judged oher entire record, which is pretty good in some respects, especially her advocacy of an outside superintendent pick. An internal pick would ber a disaster. If , and only if, she apologizes for the Sebring cover up and lies, then she should be retained as board president.If
    she tries to justify her actions, she needs to go. The OPS lawyer should be fired. She gave Gray some terrible advice, which doesn’t excuse Gray, but it is a mitigating factor…

  • D. Mark

    Mrs Gray and the lawyer should both be fired!