Home  >  Nebraska  >  NE: Council OK’s cheaper cigarette tax, popular vote avoided

NE: Council OK’s cheaper cigarette tax, popular vote avoided

By   /   October 2, 2012  /   15 Comments

Joe Jordan | Nebraska Watchdog

OMAHA—When voters go to the polls next spring they’ll pick a mayor and city council, what they apparently won’t do is vote for or against a new cigarette tax.

With the tax chopped down to 15-cents per pack, both sides agree a ballot fight is now unlikely.

On Tuesday the city council OK’d the tax by a vote of 5-2, paving the way for the city to provide approximately $35 million over 10 years toward a $370 million cancer research center.

Last week following an exclusive Nebraska Watchdog report questioning the size of the tax, initially it was 35-cents per pack, the city went to a cheaper brand—23-cents.

Prior to Tuesday’s vote it was cut again, down to 15-cents, as proponents apparently looked to avoid a vote of the people.

According to a recently passed state law (LB745), Omaha cannot impose any new occupation tax (the cigarette tax comes under that heading) that raises more than $6 million a year without voter approval.

Even when the tax was cut from 35-cents to 23 there was speculation Omaha could still exceed that $6 million mark.

But at 15-cents per pack—selling an estimated 29 million packs of cigarettes in Omaha next year—the city will bring in approximately $4.5 million dollars.

That’s low enough to keep the tax issue off next spring’s city ballot, the same ballot which will find Mayor Jim Suttle and several members of the city council facing reelection.

Those voting for the tax were four Democrats—Pete Festersen, Garry Gernandt, Ben Gray and Chris Jerram—and one Republican, Council President Tom Mulligan.

Republicans Franklin Thompson and Jean Stothert voted against the tax.

Stothert is running for mayor.

Contact Joe Jordan at joe@nebraskawatchdog.org

To subscribe to News Updates from Nebraska Watchdog at no cost, click here

Please, feel free to "steal our stuff"! Just remember to credit Watchdog.org. Find out more

Joe Jordan

  • Kevin

    So does this “no” vote still make her “mean Jean”??

  • Real Nebraskan

    The unfortunate part is that the Council Members who voted “For” this tax affect’s the highest number of constituent’s in their district. Jean Stothert and Franklin Thompson’s district have the lowest percentage of constituent’s that smoke. Therefore, are they (the other Council member’s) representing their districts or their own interests? Obviously they are in it for their own interest’s by not allowing this by to go to a vote to the public by lowering the tax to pass under their “rules”. This country is going down the tubes with Democrats forcing their will on the public. This is similar to how Obamacare was passed. When will American’s wake up and elect representatives who will stand up and fight for their constituent’s? I am not a smoker, but they have every right as non-smoker’s as long as it is legal. Freedom is slowly being taken over by our government while the blind/uninformed voter’s stand on the side line with the attitude that “It doesn’t affect me, why do I care”? These next few election’s will decide where this country and its freedoms are going if people don’t speak out now!

    May God Bless you and your family, and may God bless America.

  • Jazzee

    I agree with your statements Real Nebraskan..so anytime NOW they want more money they scream ‘occupatiobn tax?’ They target a group one group like they did the restaurants now smokers…didn’t even want to LOOK for other ways to fund this…just smack smokers cuz it’s politically correct. well all you NON smokers just wait they are coming for you…just give them time….arrogant jerks on the council spend spend spend…can’t wait for another ‘hospital’ or business wanting money and golly gee maybe they will tax all those smart phones, or pop or a special tax for all non smokers…. I will sit back and laugh at how stupid the public has become
    Question: why do they keep saying the city is in bad financial shape? thought superman suttle fixed it all..they keep mentioning pension problems suttle said that was DONE fixed deal of the century with the ignorant restaurant tax….bottom line folks THEY LIE TO US ALL THE time and we sit here and take it like fools

  • OmaSteak

    Since when is the unelected Tom Mulligan a Republican??? BTW Mr. Jordan, who goes to jail if even at the new lower level the illegal new sales tax on tobacco collects more than $6 million? At least 1 state senator is talking about doing something in the next session about Omaha’s abuse of the “occupation tax” to impose illegal sales taxes without a public vote.

  • Roger Yant

    Next on their agenda, they are coming after my HoHo’s, Why in the heck are they coming after the smokers when the university has over $1.5 BILLION in their foundation? Why, because they can. The university believes as long as they have a viable football team the politicians can run over them. Tell you how to remedy all this, VOTE THE BASTARDS OUT next election, replace all seven council members even those that voted no, this will send a message to those who run in the future. Really the problem is those elected officials believe they know better then us peons. I’m from Lincoln and we have the same problem here, they spend-tax-spend-tax. In Lincoln the city owes over $1 billion in bonds, notes and other money but vote for more bonds, that eventually have to be paid. Most of the elected officials have money that these tax increases don’t really effect them, so they stick it to the hard working people of Omaha and Lincoln.

  • Tax and Spend Pete

    Well Pete Festersen already has an opponent. I will gladly be voting for Ed Truemper instead of tax and spend Pete!

  • ToucheTurtle

    Your post is spot on!!! If we allow our government to discriminate against a group of citizens – like smokers – you can bet that the longer it goes on the easier it will be for them to pick out a new group. And you never know when their target may just be the group you belong to!!! Beware . . . we are sliding down a slippery slope, and this kind of taxation is gaining momentum!

  • 68102 guy

    I wonder if a tax on all Husker memorabilia at a 7% rate would have passed? The U of N generates tons the revenue from their licensed apparel, why not give it the ‘ol occupation treatment? Too broad of a base to try to slip that in, I guess.

  • Jazzee

    Questions: Will they remove the TAX once the med center’s building is done??OR will they SPEND SPEND SPEND it..perhaps buy bikes for the bike paths??? The whole thing was way too rushed with no questions/answers from anyone in the media or the council. what IF it goes over the 6 million???? anyone held responsible? what a joke this city is
    Mulligan isn’t a republican
    gray is soooooooooooo arrogant thinks he is obama 2.0 they both stink
    gernandt should be replaced
    old pete is a no mind
    the other two..not sure where they are half the time

  • D. Mark

    Is anyone surprised? The rubber-stamp round table at it again!

  • DoNotTread73

    Because the shirts don’t cause cancer that are a drag to any economy when people get cancer, lose work, can’t be treated, ruin finances etc etc etc. Tax the cancer sticks!

  • Jazzee

    not a fan of Jean but she and Thompson did the right thing

  • Jazzee

    GOOD we need one to get rid of gernandt, jerram and arrogant gray

  • 68102 guy

    So our government derives income off of a known harmful product. Is the income that lucrative that they can’t let go of it? If it’s so terrible, it should be put on the list with all other drugs. Just like seat belt fines and speed trap cameras, not about public health and well-being, but all about the revenue.

  • Jazzee

    stop calling Mulligan a republican please all these guys are cowards
    won’t let people vote on anything just ‘they know best’
    well hopefully the smokers will stick it to them this whole thing was/is wrong and they all know it wouldn’t even hold over to find ANY other solution NO just TAX people..why didn’t they tax pop???? or lawyers?????? cowards all of them