Home  >  Wisconsin  >  WI: Governor’s mansion, where Walker doesn’t live, costs taxpayers a pretty penny

WI: Governor’s mansion, where Walker doesn’t live, costs taxpayers a pretty penny

By   /   December 13, 2012  /   News  /   10 Comments

By Kirsten Adshead  |  Wisconsin Reporter

MADISON — Gov. Scott Walker only spent 28 nights this year in the $3.9 million executive residence on the shores of Lake Mendota, as of last month’s election, a Wisconsin Reporter review of his official schedule shows.

The mansion’s annual budget, funded by taxpayers, is $270,700.

Wisconsin taxpayers pay a baseline of $270,700 a year for an executive residence that’s rarely the home of the governor and his family, a Wisconsin Reporter analysis has found.

So if Walker’s average of staying there 2.7 nights a month holds for the rest of the year, that works out to about $8,258 a night.

By contrast, a midweek suite with king bed and whirlpool at the Hilton Monona Terrace goes for $259.

“We are, or should be, in a new age of austerity in government, and looking to find savings everywhere,” Chris Edwards, director of tax policy studies for the conservative Cato Institute, wrote in an email to Wisconsin Reporter on Thursday. “People at the top of government should set an example.”

The $270,700, in the state budget covers the executive residence’s staffing costs.

There’s a separate appropriation for maintenance and operations — things like lawn care and snow removal. That budget for the executive residence last fiscal year was an additional $322,700, according to the Department of Administration.

In addition, the executive residence — and the cost of its upkeep — made headlines last week after reports surfaced that the DOA was seeking $478,700 from the State Building Commission to upgrade the mansion’s kitchens — yes, kitchens. There are two, one used for public events and another, private kitchenette on the second floor.

The item was pulled from the agenda hours before the commission was scheduled to meet Wednesday.

Instead, first lady Tonette Walker will try to use the Wisconsin Executive Residence Foundation to raise private funds for the full amount of the project.

“We will bring this issue before the Commission again in the future if state funds are needed, but will provide WERF the opportunity to raise funds before turning to taxpayer dollars,” DOA Secretary Mike Huebsch said in a statement.


The outcome of that renovation project, however, doesn’t answer the fundamental issue: Does Wisconsin need an executive residence at all? Are taxpayers getting their money’s worth?

Linda Hughes, for one, says “yes.”

Hughes has a personal connection to the executive residence. She designs and creates the ornaments for the Christmas tree honoring Wisconsin veterans that is included as part of the mansion’s holiday decorations every year.

Many of those ornaments recognize soldiers who have been killed.

And Hughes, whose cousin died in Iraq in 2005, appreciates being able to have the tree displayed in the intimate setting of the governor’s residence, versus a more openly public building, such as the state Capitol.

“I know it’s expensive to keep this going, but this (a soldier’s death) is a family loss and (the Christmas tree honoring them) needs to stay in the family residence,” she said Wednesday during a public tour of the home.

Indeed, for a building called the “executive residence,” family life there typically takes a backseat to other events.

In requesting funds for the kitchen renovations, the DOA explained that those kitchens serve 15,000 people each year.

Even when he doesn’t stay there overnight, Walker uses the residence for events — some more serious than others.

His Oct. 6 calendar, for instance, shows he was scheduled to tailgate with the Wisconsin Economic Development Corp. before the Illini-Badgers game.

In June, he hosted lawmakers for a “beer and brats” summit, in hopes of boosting bipartisan accord after a bitter recall election.

There’s a practical argument for keeping the residence up and running as well.

Sure, Walker can commute back and forth to the Wauwatosa home he shares with his wife and sons, and it’s been decades since Wisconsin has chosen a governor who hasn’t already called southern Wisconsin home.

But it’s conceivable that a governor could be elected from, say, Appleton or Eau Claire, cities too far away to make a regular commute logistically feasible.

The state bought the executive residence in 1949, and it’s been the official home of the governor and his family ever since.

For some, the tradition alone is reason enough to keep it going.

Joanne McCormick of Madison pledged not to be political when she toured the mansion Wednesday.

“This is a holiday. This is about Christmas,” McCormick said, but then added, “And it’s also sort of about intimidating a governor who doesn’t seem to like too many people around.”

McCormick said she first toured the mansion in the 1960s, and she tries to tour it again at least once whenever a new governor comes along.

“I figure it’s our home, too, and I’m proud of it,” she said.

But tradition might not be reason enough to justify taxpayers footing a bill for something that perhaps has outlived its ostensible purpose, Edwards said.

He cited New York and Virginia as two states that have been debating what services their governors should continue to receive at taxpayers’ expense.

“Governors mansions seem to be a hold-over from colonial times when there was a ground house for the king’s representative. I’m not sure whether they really fit in a republican form of government,” he said. “The president of the United States needs a special house of course — for safety and to visit with foreign leaders. But those reasons don’t apply so much at the state level.”

Contact Kirsten Adshead at kadshead@wisconsinreporter.com. 

Edited by Kelly Carson, kcarson@watchdog.org


Kirsten formerly served as staff reporter for Watchdog.org.

  • Did anyone worry about this when Doyle or any other Democrat was in office? Just wonderering? To me, other business is conducted there and sometimes 24/7; and it has the security needed to protect a Governor (Democrat or Republican. My vote would be to leave the Governor’s mansion – not a high priority on my list.

  • This is a story?

  • P. Brunker

    I think we didn’t have to worry about this in prior years as the economy was in a better state. Not the case now, the rich are getting richer, the poor and middle class poorer, where are the jobs? Oshkosh laying off 450 employees, and I could go on and on. State patrol guards the home in Tosa 24/7 so he need not worry about security issues. Get rid of the mansion.

  • javman

    Not only do we pay for the mansion we also pay for his daily commute so we pay double either live in it our get rid of it his parties can be held somewhere else.

  • Amfortas5


  • Dave Hebert

    The Walker administration neither built the mansion, bought the mansion nor demanded the mansion. As in other states, the Governor’s mansion is a practical and proud tradition – which this piece touches upon but buries. Are you suggesting that Wisconsin’s governor – of either party – be virtually imprisoned in the mansion by requiring him/her to spend the majority of evenings during his/her term there? Does it even matter that they may have family matters which properly justify a family decision to remain anchored in their home community? Should we demand that state office holders abandon the homes, neighbors and communities to which they expect to return following their terms?

    Please, if you’re going to claim to speak on behalf of taxpayers, at least be professional enough to do so in a non-partisan and constructive manner.

  • X

    No one seems interested in the $1.4 Billion Obama spent on himself in 2011, which came to $76,712.33 per day for Wisconsin and every other state.

  • emmysue

    I agree with the previous 5 comments. This is the shoddiest piece of journalistic CR*P I’ve seen in a while. The math involved: Cost per year divided by nights slept in, should win the award as the most disingenuous bull written in 2012. This article belongs in the Cap Times. If I see much more of this quality I will unsubcribe.

  • Here’s how you determine if Walker is wasteful: Add the cost of the governor’s mansion plus any mileage expense (if any) Walker takes to commute from Wauwatosa. and make it an annualized number. Then take the same numbers for Jim Doyle of the years he was governor. I haven’t run these numbers, but I highly doubt that Walker spent more not living in the residence than Doyle and family did living there.

  • nick

    I agree with all the other fellow commentors. I have almost no bias as i am not loyal to any party. This is what loyalty to parties cause. Lack of political knowledge and ignoring the flaws of your parties candidates. “i discriminate equally” -Ron Paul. It’s pretty obvious you dont like the governors mansion but it is also quite obvious you dont like Governor Scott Walker. You seem to blame him for this spending yet the mansion has been with the government since 1949. I dont care if he goes there a lot or not. It would still be wasteful spending weather he didnt stay and Doyle did. The amount of money wont change(if anything its less). We arent going to force him to stay in the house, it isn’t a prison. So is this another attempt blaming the governor simply due to his party affiliation? I do think it is a waste of money but that isn’t one governors blame. Its a large amount of government officials. We have a very large amount wasteful spending. This is small compared to the large picture.