Home  >  Nebraska  >  NE governor proposes scrapping income tax

NE governor proposes scrapping income tax

By   /   January 15, 2013  /   10 Comments

Gov. Dave Heineman and Sen. Heath Mello, D-Omaha, shake hands after the governor’s speech. Mello is now chairman of the powerful Appropriations Committee. Photo by Bethany Schmidt/Nebraska Watchdog

By Deena Winter | Nebraska Watchdog

LINCOLN – Gov. Dave Heineman today proposed ending the state income tax – or at least reducing it – in exchange for ending a host of sales tax exemptions on various goods and services.

“Are we willing to be bold and courageous to address our tax system?” he asked.

The governor called Nebraska’s tax climate mediocre and said reforming the tax code to create a better climate would create more high-paying jobs. The Tax Foundation ranks Nebraska’s business tax climate 31st in the nation, and the governor wants to improve that ranking by eliminating or reducing the individual income tax and corporate income tax. Nine states have no income tax.

The governor did not specify which of the $5 billion in sales tax exemptions he would scrap – other than to say he would not lift the sales tax exemption on groceries, saying that idea wouldn’t float. Currently, goods and services such as animal grooming, ag machinery, medicine, newspapers, medical equipment, laundromats, lottery tickets and vehicle repairs are exempt from the state sales tax.

“Nebraska exempts more than we collect,” he said during his State of the State address to lawmakers. “Our tax system shouldn’t favor one industry over another.”

If the state eliminated just half the current exemptions, it wouldn’t have to charge an individual or corporate income tax, he said. The state hasn’t had a serious discussion about its tax system in five decades, Heineman said.

“This is the discussion that our state needs to have,” he said. “The tax system needs to be modernized and transformed.”

Gov. Dave Heineman proposed ending the state income tax today during his State of the State speech to lawmakers. Photo by Bethany Schmidt/Nebraska Watchdog

Sen. Jeremy Nordquist, D-Omaha, called the governor’s tax proposal “dead on arrival.” The state would likely have to end the sales tax exemptions on many necessities to make up the lost revenue from income taxes paid by high-income earners, Nordquist said. He called the proposal a tax shift from high-income earners to a regressive sales tax on things such as medical equipment, pharmaceuticals, ag equipment and even dorm rooms. The two-year tuition freeze enabled by the governor’s increase in higher ed funding would be mostly wiped out if college dorms began being taxed, Nordquist said.

“I think it’s going to have real tough sledding,” he said of the governor’s proposed income tax cut.

Sen. Heath Mello, D-Omaha, who is now chairman of the Appropriations Committee, was more diplomatic, saying it would be “a little premature” for him to react to a proposal he hasn’t seen. But he said he shares the governor’s proposal to increase education funding.

Speaker Greg Adams said he was pleased with the priorities Heineman laid out today and, as former chairman of the Education Committee, particularly his education funding increases. As for the income tax cut, Adams said he agrees in principle that it’s “worthy of looking at.”

Heineman’s two-year budget proposal – which contains no tax increases but increases general fund spending by nearly 5 percent — also would:

• Increase K-12 education and special education funding 5 percent each of the next two years. State aid to schools would increase from the current $852 million to $939 million by fiscal year 2015.

• Increase higher education funding 5 percent each of the two years, allowing public colleges and universities to freeze tuition for two years.

• Continue funding the property tax credit program to Nebraskans, which has provided about $680 million in property tax relief since 2007.

• Not expand Medicaid, as allowed under Obamacare, because the governor says it would cost the state hundreds of millions of dollars, although some lawmakers disagree with that.

• Rebuild the state’s cash reserve fund from its current $384 million to $442 million in fiscal 2016-17.

• Fund a new Central Nebraska Veterans Home.

Contact Deena Winter at deena@nebraskawatchdog.org.

Editor’s note: to subscribe to News Updates from Nebraska Watchdog at no cost, click here.

Please, feel free to "steal our stuff"! Just remember to credit Watchdog.org. Find out more

Deena Winter

  • http://twitter.com/GerardHarbison Gerard Harbison

    If Nordquist objects to a sales tax on medical equipment, i hope he doesn’t support Obamacare, which is partly paid for by a tax on medical equipment.

  • Watching_From_Lincoln

    for a former West Point graduate and Army Officer, HeineyMan has forgotten (if he ever learned it in the first place) one of the most basic tenets of the Army: If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. There is NOTHING wrong with the tax system set up by Republican Governor Norbert Tiemann, other than there is a concerted effort by the Neo-Fascists who now masquerade as the modern Republican Party to undo EVERYTHING good and beneficial to the people ever accomplished by the real Republicans in this country. Tax the poor, let the rich and corporations slide by. We now see HeineyMan’s true colors and just whom he is working for, and it ISN’T the PEOPLE of Nebraska. The little fascist dictator really thinks the lame duck years of his administration he can literally get away with murder.

  • Watching_From_Lincoln

    No Gerard, you buffoon, Sen. Norquist objects to a tax proposal that is patently unfair to those who can least afford it in Nebraska: The working poor.

  • hayseed

    The most courageous governor in recent times was Norbert Tiemann. He was instrumental in making the tax system more equitable. A progressive income tax is the most fair tax because if one has income, one has the ability to pay.
    It also obligates us to be responsible citizens, having benefited for whatever success we achieve under our economic system. The Republican party made Tiemann a one term governor. We do not want to go back to a more regressive tax system. Every governor since Kay Orr has been catering to business with tax breaks and incentives and studies have shown it has provided little benefit to the people. Meanwhile the poverty rate has increased and the most vulnerable-mainly children have been neglected.

  • http://twitter.com/GerardHarbison Gerard Harbison

    You don’t know what ‘literally’ means, do you, imbecile?

  • http://twitter.com/GerardHarbison Gerard Harbison

    No, WfL, you cowardly ranting dolt. If it hurts the working poor to tax medical equipment, then why did ObamaCare tax medical equipment?

    Please make your answer pertinent to the question, if that’s possible for you.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ricky.fulton Ricky Fulton

    Not surprisingly the Gov won’t spell out which tax exemptions he would cut to pay for the state eliminating the income tax.
    That reminds me of the G O P led US House of Representatives which proposes spending cuts but won’t tell which cuts they want.
    So it was a political speech short on details which is not surprising.
    It’s Governor Lame Duck from here on out.

  • Jazzee

    wow it’s amazing how fast everyone is to attack and not open to any new ideas whatsoever in this state….where is all this anger when suttle lies to all of you? when your wonderful city gov can’t think of anything new but more taxes?

  • http://www.facebook.com/dan.brandt2 Dan Brandt

    Does it really matter? He is not eliminating any taxes, he is just shuffling them around. The amazing thing is he expects to cut mostly business loopholes to cover the losses. Wouldn’t it just be easier to curtail LB 775 and the Angel Investor’s act? There is no boldness or thinking outside the box here. Just a political shell game that in the end means little. If he really was innovative, he would find a way to cut government and then cut the taxes necessary to run the defunct parts.

  • capitalismfirst

    Lots of commentators don’t give a dang about the working man. Abolishing the income tax is an awesome idea. If your worried about the poor, stop taxing their tobacco and alcohol and cut the payroll tax back instead of raising it up 2 percent. Abolishing the income tax is a great idea! Paying sales tax of a dime here and there is nothing compared to forking over a few grand to government. Abolish the income tax now.