Home  >  Florida  >  Florida lawmaker calls red-light cameras ‘scam on poor people’

Florida lawmaker calls red-light cameras ‘scam on poor people’

By   /   January 24, 2013  /   7 Comments

By Yael Ossowski | Florida Watchdog

ST. PETERSBURG – Red-light cameras are nothing more than a money-making scheme aimed at the poor, state Sen. Daphne Campbell says.

The cameras have nothing to do with actual safety at intersections, the Miami Democrat said.

FREEZE: Campbell is challenging red-light cameras because she says they are illegal and discriminatory against the poor.

“They’ve turned something so simple and elementary into a money business,” she told Florida Watchdog. “People who are poor and have nothing to eat are getting these tickets unjustly and they can’t do anything but pay them.”

Campbell is the author of a bill to ban red-light cameras in the Sunshine State, barring their installation by state, county and local officials.

She initially introduced the bill in the first week of committee hearings in Tallahassee and scored a victory Wednesday when it was assigned to the Economic Affairs Committee.

The bill must be approved by the committee before it is put on the legislative calendar for the beginning of the session.

“I’m working hard to repeal this because everyone is trying to make money on the poor people,” said Campbell. “It’s a scam on the poor people.”

NO MORE: Campbell is insistent that red-light cameras are only used to collect revenue from the people.

Red-light cameras have received a frosty reception in Florida, but that feeling was challenged earlier this month by a study by the state Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, claiming the number of crashes are declining at intersections with red-light cameras.

“A majority of agencies reported decreases in the total number of crashes at red light camera intersections,” the study reads. “Agencies reported that in addition to the decrease in total crashes, traffic safety improved throughout the jurisdiction as drivers were more cautious when approaching all intersections.”

The study was conducted using an online survey completed by Florida law enforcement agencies and the vendors who sell the cameras to cities and counties.

The legality of red-light cameras, however, has been addressed by Florida courts.

In March 2012, Pasco County judge Anne Wansboro dismissed a red-light traffic camera case because the law “impermissibly shifts the burden of proof to the defendant and therefore does not afford due process, and is unconstitutional to the extent due process is not provided.”

Interestingly enough, the state study notes that 70 percent of all citations challenged by defendants are ultimately dismissed by the courts because of “lack of probable cause.”

And that is not a conclusion unique to the Sunshine State.

DAMAGE DONE: A Watchdog.org investigation revealed the use of illegal yellow lights in city of Virginia Beach.

A Watchdog.org investigation in Virginia Beach last week found the city was illegally shortening the yellow lights in order to trap more motorists with red-light cameras. The city reset the traffic signals after the investigation was published.

The Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles was asked to comment on Campbell’s bill and the doubts raised surrounding red-light cameras, but refused to comment.

“Those cameras are not for safety,” Campbell told Florida Watchdog. “I’m a registered nurse, and I know they’re not for safety. They’re discriminatory against innocent people told they’re guilty by a machine. That’s wrong.

“We need to rally everybody around this issue to really understand what is going on,” she added.

Contact Yaël Ossowski, Watchdog.org’s Florida Bureau Chief, at Yael@Watchdog.org and follow him @YaelOss

Please, feel free to "steal our stuff"! Just remember to credit Watchdog.org. Find out more

Yaël Ossowski

  • Dawnadoo

    Red-light cameras are nothing more than a money-making scheme aimed at the poor, state Sen. Daphne Campbell says.(Watchdowg.org)

    I really don’t know how the red-light cameras work. I’ve read everything from, there are LEOs sitting in front of monitors watching the cars, to there are magnets under the roads. I guess I missed the artcle on how the actually DID work. However I’ve got to admit I agree with Sen. Campbell. I’ve ALWAYS thought of the cameras as money makers. Now as far as them being aimed at the poor. I don’t know how she came up with that.
    I also do NOT understand where the Dept. of Hwy Safety and Motor vehicles can fathom the idea that red light accidents have decreased since they’ve been installed. I’m more cautious when going thru the lights, however it makes me much more nervous and jumpy because I know they’re there. Therefore IF THE LIGHT CHANGES from green to yellow, I automatically hit the brakes. NOT really hard enough to make a difference. However, IF by chance someone else reacts the same way I do, and they’re running on bad tires, IN THE RAIN. Then that could cause an accident.
    The Sheriff has said, he’s changed the timming of the yellow light to a little longer change time. But I can NOT tell the difference and if there are visitors who don’t know the yellow light is a little longer, they’re likely to react just as I do causing an accident.
    THAT can put a hardship on people who live paycheck to paycheck. Especially, if the person in the rear hits a vehicle from behind. Whether they’re at fault or not. Their insuance goes up, plus they may have a higher deductible to cut down on monthly pmts. Which would have to be paid at the time the vehicle is fixed (if it can be), Plus they may have to pay a rental fee, I mean the list could go on and on and yeah, I know the law regarding, following to close behind another vehicle. HOWEVER, most drivers now days don’t KNOW THE LAW, or if they do, don’t go by it.
    There are many laws NOT ENFORCED other than running red-lights. AND I’M NOT SHEDDING LIGHT ON RED-LIGHT RUNNERS IN THE LEAST!!!You can see this at 4 way stops, as well as when others are making u-turns & getting there at approx. the SAME TIME & especially at red-lights. One vehicle is making a u-turn (left green arrow) the other vehicle is making a right turn, (red light) onto the same HWY. THE DRIVER ON THE HWY, ST. RD. AVE. BLVD. etc…. AND YOU’RE TURNING ONTO THIS HWY, ST, RD, AVE, BLVD, etc…you do NOT have the right of way. THE VEHICLE ON THE HWY, ST, RD, AVE, BLVD etc…. you’re TURNING ON TO, HAS THE RIGHT OF WAY!!!!! NOT YOU!!!! How did you get your license? Do they NOT test any longer or do you just exchange license when you come from another state?
    Anyway as I mentioned, I have to agree with Sen. Campbell on the part of her statement saying the red-light cameras are money makeing scheme, however I’m not understanding the claim she makes, by saying, “aimed at the poor.”
    POSSIBLY someone will be able to help me understand why she made THAT claim????…
    ********apologies vent’n…..
    ~just say’n

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000559424743 Paul Henry

    It sure would be nice if people would read and comprehend the state undocumented camera survey before talking about it. I did, and you can read about it here:
    http://bit.ly/W1ETfh

    It’s not worth the electrons you’ll use to download it.

    Automated for-profit law enforcement is a bad idea, and it is un-American. Support the 2013 Florida Motorist Rights Restoration Act.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/James-Walker/100003394056675 James Walker

    Rep. Campbell is correct and the cameras need to be banned. The Florida Dept. of Transportation changed the rules in July 2011 to allow cities to deliberately set yellows too short for the actual traffic speeds. This causes thousands of tickets for split second violations for the sole purpose of raising revenue from safe drivers. It is 100% a scam that must end.
    James C. Walker, National Motorists Association

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Cesar-M-Gonzalez/1104556209 Cesar M Gonzalez

    I am in favor of red light cameras in every corner of Miami-Dade County ! These cameras have already saved lives. Only traffic violators have something to lose with these cameras.

  • http://www.facebook.com/stormy.night.7 Stormy Night

    Bad for everyone, but those who are poor cannot afford to pay the
    ticket or get an attorney…AND.. now they have higher penalties for
    challenging and losing in Pasco and it is not their intention for you to
    win so you have to pay the original fine $158 plus the higher amount to
    let it go to court $104 plus the court cost if you lose I believe it is $500 now.
    How many poor people are good at arguing their own cases before a judge
    and prosecuting attorney? So in reality, the poor (who need
    transportation for work) end up losing their licenses by not being able
    to pay or not being able to successfully challenge a ticket. Another
    unconstitutional requirement – making a person pay a hefty fine if they
    challenge a ticket and lose… just greed.

  • cuppatea@yahoo.co.jp

    The cameras make driving more dangerous. Rear-end collisions increase in frequency near the cameras and they shorten yellow lights, causing drivers in one to drive at top speed through the intersection. If you knew more about driver safety you would change your statement.

  • djcastel

    “The study was conducted using an online survey completed by Florida law
    enforcement agencies and the vendors who sell the cameras to cities and
    counties.” Hello? Ever heard of conflict of interest? This would be thrown out of any reputable science journal.