Home  >  Missouri  >  MO House committee bows to pressure on voter ID hearing

MO House committee bows to pressure on voter ID hearing

By   /   January 25, 2013  /   6 Comments

ENTLICHER: With time change committee may have to reconvene later in day.

By Johnny Kampis | Missouri Watchdog

ST. LOUIS – Bowing to public pressure, the House Elections Committee changed the meeting time to discuss a controversial voter ID proposal pushed by Republicans.

That committee had originally announced a 6:45 a.m. start time Tuesday for the hearing, but moved the time to 8 a.m. after receiving jeers from the left.

New Secretary of State Jason Kander, a Democrat, said there was no legitimate reason to hold a hearing so early.

“It is not open and honest government, and it creates an unnecessary hardship for Missourians interested in testifying on the legislation or just listening to the hearing,” said Kander, who is against photo ID requirements for voting. “Hearings should always be held at easily accessible times for Missourians, especially when dealing with legislation as controversial and complicated as these proposals.”

Sean Nicholson, who heads the liberal advocacy group Progress Missouri, criticized the committee on Twitter for scheduling the hearing that early.

Committee chairwoman Rep. Sue Entlicher, R-Bolivar, reversed course hours after announcing the original time. She indicated in a statement that the committee wanted to start earlier to provide ample time for testimony before the House went into session at 10 a.m. Tuesday.

“We want to be accommodating to those who are interested in testifying on these bills,” Entlicher said. “Depending on the turnout, we may have to recess and then reconvene upon session adjournment to ensure everyone has the opportunity to express their opinion.”

In addition to hearing testimony on HB 48, which specifies certain forms of photo ID required to vote in an election, the committee will hear talk on companion bill HJR 5, which proposes a constitutional amendment specifying that general law may require a person to provide valid government-issued photo ID to vote.

Both of those pieces of legislation were introduced by Rep. Tony Dugger, R-Hartville.

The committee may also listen to discussion about HJR 4, dubbed the “Term Limit Reform Act.”

That legislation introduced by Rep. Myron Neth, R-Liberty, would keep the 16-year total term limit now in place for lawmakers, but would allow them to serve the entire period in one chamber. Now, legislators can serve eight years each in the House and Senate.

Contact Johnny Kampis at [email protected] For more Missouri Watchdog updates, visit Facebook and Twitter, or sign up for a free newsletter.



Johnny Kampis is National Watchdog Reporter for Watchdog.org. Johnny previously worked in the newspaper industry and as a freelance writer, and has been published in The New York Times, Time.com, FoxNews.com and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. A former semi-professional poker player, he is writing a book documenting the poker scene at the 2016 World Series of Poker, a decade after the peak of the poker boom. Johnny is also a member of Investigative Reporters and Editors.

  • We need Voter ID passed on MO. I want my Representative and Senator to see this through and stay on task!

  • Brian DeSmet

    yes, let’s spend more time trying to pass legislation that is CLEARLY unconstitutional.

  • Brian DeSmet

    yes, you certainly don’t want to let those dirty minorities and old people to be allowed to vote. that would be an actual democracy, and Republicans can’t win in one of those any more.

  • How is showing an ID unconstitutional? You have to show an id to get government assistance, drive, cash a check, and in my business a valid state or govt, id is required. If there is nothing to hide or fraud being committed why is this such an issue?

  • Depends on how you write the rules, Christina. When they are written to disenfranchise the poor and elderly, then it gets dicey. So imagine you are like my Grandmother, who was born at home, and never had a birth certificate. Then imagine a courthouse fire that destroyed copies of your marriage license, or your divorce decree, or… It is not just that you have to show proof of citizenship, you also have to show proof of every other relative change in your life that would affect your name, etc.

  • Having worked at a job with the lower income and elderly, i can tell you that when wanting assistance, they had NO problem with providing id. There only seems to be a problem when asking for proof of citizenship when voting.