Home  >  Illinois  >  ‘Harmful’ sequestration cuts a drop in the bucket for Illinois spending

‘Harmful’ sequestration cuts a drop in the bucket for Illinois spending

By   /   February 25, 2013  /   News  /   1 Comment

Part 2 of 11 in the series The Sequester

By Benjamin Yount | Illinois watchdog

SPRINGFIELD — On paper, $34 million in cuts to Illinois’ schools sound scary. In reality, it’s relatively nothing.

That money — what the White House says Illinois will lose in education grant money should sequestration cuts happen — is .35 percent of Illinois’ total education budget, which is $9.5 billion.

If  looking only at federal dollars spent in Illinois classrooms, the $34 million amounts to 1.15 percent, as the state got $2.9 billion from Washington, D.C., for its current education budget.

But that’s not what people will hear in talking points sent by the White House. Instead, the Obama administration is saying the loss of .35 percent of Illinois’ education budget will put 460 teachers or teachers’ aides “at risk.”

“We’ve seen the reduction of more than 6,000 teachers since (2010) because of state budget cuts,” Mary Fergus, a spokesman for the Illinois State Board of Education, said.

Fergus said any cuts to school spending, no matter how small, would hurt. But Fergus said the $34 million in grant money doesn’t comprise a significant part of Illinois’ education budget.

“Very little of education funding in Illinois comes from the federal government,” Fergus explained. “This is a cut to a very small pot of federal funds.”

The $34 million on the sequestration chopping block was earmarked for low-income schools and special education classes.

Few local school districts would be surprised if they lose any of that money. Fergus said her office has been working with schools since last spring to let them know how sequestration cuts could affect the state.

Steve Staneck, a research fellow at the free market Heartland Institute, said sequestration is more headline than spending cut.

NOT MUCH: Stanek says sequestration cuts don't add up to real money.

NOT MUCH: Stanek says sequestration cuts don’t add up to real money.

“The cuts amount to a drop in a bucket. They should have almost no impact,” Stanek said. “But I suspect the government will look for ways to make people feel pain, because making people feel pain will make them scream for more spending.”

The White House was warning people about the pain Monday.

“These cuts would have macroeconomic consequences. Nationwide, hundreds of thousands of jobs would be lost,” said Jason Furman, assistant to the president for Economic Policy.

States on Monday got a preview of what will happen, Furman said, unless Congress agrees to avoid, or to delay, the $85 billion in sequestration cuts.

But even Furman admitted no one knows for sure what will happen.

“In some cases it could be a little better, in some cases it could be a little worse,” Furman said. “Depending on how you reprioritize the money.”

But who defines “priority?”

BLUE OR BLUE ANGELS: Oman says it's out of his hands whether Rockford will lose its air show to sequestration.

BLUE OR BLUE ANGELS: Oman says it’s out of his hands whether Rockford will lose its air show to sequestration.

Geoff Oman, marketing manager for the Chicago Rockford International Airport, defines his priority as the Blue Angels, the Navy’s precision flying team and the headline act for the Rockford AirFest.

“We’re selling tickets now, and have been since December,” Oman said. “But we’re in wait-and-see mode now. We’re going forward as if this is going to happen.”

If the Blue Angels, or any of AirFest’s other military acts — including Army parachute team the Golden Knights — is cut because of sequestration, the entire air show may have to be scrapped.

“Canceling altogether is an option,” Oman said. “But unfortunately we don’t have a lot of control. We all cast our votes and the people who won are in control now. And we have to deal with it.”

Contact Benjamin Yount at Ben@IllinoisWatchdog.org

Part of 11 in the series The Sequester


Ben formerly served as staff reporter for Watchdog.org.

  • Danni

    I was always, and remain, terrible at math, so, please check my calculation: that $34 million shortfall can be covered this way-as we all know pensions are the current culprit, making too many millionaires of police chiefs, administrators and teacher/public employees and legislators. So just do this-divide that shortfall among the 749,894 pension recipients-that’s $34,000,000/749894 and you get 45.339741350110815 and so on and so on. Round it up, yes up, so we can create a windfall for the state and you have a reduction of $46.00 per year in annual pension-a lot less than those of us who had to pay those increased state taxes, 5%, hmm reminder, those lucky pensioners did not have to pay. So, let’s see, $46.00 per year is $3.833333333333 per month. WOW. Or better yet, tax those pensions with state income tax. Let’s see-according to the State, you know, that one run by the Dems, as is every other failed state, the pension expense for 2013 is $5.9 billion
    so 5% of 5,900,000,000 is $295,000,000-that’s $295 million or about nine times the dollars needed to make up this shortfall. C’mon, guys really the answer is clear, but, of course that would mean taxing your pensions too, Illinois pols and you can’t have that, just every private sector person should pay the 5% income tax, right?.