Home  >  Missouri  >  MO lawmakers want to curb union cash in politics

MO lawmakers want to curb union cash in politics

By   /   March 14, 2013  /   News  /   1 Comment

PAYCHECKS: The Missouri legislature wants  to prevent unions from using dues for political purposes without worker consent.

PROTECT OUR PAYCHECKS: The Missouri Legislature wants to prevent unions from using dues for political purposes without worker consent.

By Johnny Kampis | Missouri Watchdog

ST. LOUIS – If you’re a union member, the Missouri General Assembly wants to help keep politicians’ hands out of your wallet.

Both the Missouri House and Senate OK’ed bills this week that would allow union members to opt out of their dues being used for election campaigns.

Republican Rep. Eric Burlison’s so-called “paycheck protection” bill passed the House Wednesday by a 90-65 vote. His legislation, House Bill 64, would require labor groups to receive annual authorization from members before using their dues for political purposes.

The Senate passed a companion bill on Tuesday after an eight-hour Democratic filibuster forced an amendment that only allows deductions with the annual consent of employees, matching the House bill.

“The bill simply gives workers more control over how their money is spent, and makes unions more accountable to their members,” said Burlison, of Springfield.  “We have seen too many examples of unions using the dues they collect to support political agendas that run contrary to those supported by their members.”

Such states as Michigan, Ohio and Washington already have similar laws.

Burlison’s bill will move through the Senate, while Senate Bill 29, from Rolla Republican Dan Brown, goes to the House.

Both are likely to pass the Republican-dominated bodies, but could face a veto from Democratic and pro-union Gov. Jay Nixon.

Democratic Rep. Kevin McManus, of Kansas City, called Burlison’s bill an attack on unions.

“Why are we regulating one group in particular in their speech?” he asked during floor debate. “Is it because the people supporting this bill don’t like what they have to say?”

Burlison’s bill initially exempted such groups as firefighters and police officers, but he amended it after recent reports that Kansas City police officers were forced to join the Fraternal Order of Police.

Unions are taking a beating this legislative session.

The General Assembly also is considering a measure that would make Missouri a right-to-work state, meaning that union membership cannot be required as a condition of employment.

Lawmakers have passed right-to-work bills before, but Nixon vetoed them. The most recent proposal would skip his John Hancock and go straight to Missouri voters, who would vote the law up or down in November.

Burlison introduced that one too. There’s been no activity on it since last month’s standing-room-only public hearing.

Contact Johnny Kampis at [email protected] For more Missouri Watchdog updates, visit Facebook and Twitter, or sign up for a free newsletter.



Johnny Kampis is National Watchdog Reporter for Watchdog.org. Johnny previously worked in the newspaper industry and as a freelance writer, and has been published in The New York Times, Time.com, FoxNews.com and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. A former semi-professional poker player, he is writing a book documenting the poker scene at the 2016 World Series of Poker, a decade after the peak of the poker boom. Johnny is also a member of Investigative Reporters and Editors.

  • Don

    There is a lot of difference in private company Unions and public unions, private Company’s have competition with other company’s producing the same product so their contracts will reflect on bottom line to stay in business unlike the Government who just raises Tax’s. Government unions giving kick backs to Government official’s and that what it amounts to other wise why would when you spend millions to get a favorite politician either elected or reelected. It would be the same as giving your boss, foremen, supervisor a little money every week or month to make sure you get a raise or a hike in benefits or job position or giving somebody a little under the table to seal a bid on a contract you bid on. To be fair no Union money, either Private or Public should be spent on either party or anything to do with State Government.