Home  >  Wisconsin  >  Johnson's bill takes aim at health-care law

Johnson's bill takes aim at health-care law

By   /   September 11, 2012  /   4 Comments

By M.D. Kittle | Wisconsin Reporter

MADISON — President Barack Obama and the Democratic Party may have built the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The U.S. Supreme Court may have upheld it.

But U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisconsin, aims to push back what he sees as an Internal Revenue Service power grab and knock a huge hole into the implementation of the federal health-care law.Johnson’s Senate Joint Resolution 48, which he introduced in late July, about a month after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision, goes after an IRS rule on “premium assistance credits,” which subsidize health-insurance premiums in health-care exchanges.

U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson

The senator and others see the IRS rules as an end around to the health-care law, which requires states to set up health care exchanges through which subsidies are paid out to cover insurance premiums. In 2016, the Affordable Care Act, for example, will provide a $10,000 insurance subsidy to uninsured individuals in households earning $64,000 per year, bloating the cost of government entitlements and debt, Johnson told Wisconsin Reporter.

The law tweak would push the subsidies and penalties for businesses that drop employee health-care insurance through federal channels, not through the states as the health-care act outlines.

Opponents of the IRS rule not only assert that it is unconstitutional, giving law-making — or law-changing — authority to unelected bureaucrats, but it forces states choosing to opt out of the exchanges back in.

Wisconsin is among several states, led by Republican governors, threatening to pass on setting up exchanges, effectively turning over that authority to the federal government.

Gov. Scott Walker, immediately following the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling, said he would wait until November to do anything, hoping for a Republican victory in the presidential and congressional elections that would fulfill a GOP promise to “Repeal and Replace” the federal health-care law.

“When job creators and Wisconsin families are facing difficult times it doesn’t make sense to commit to a federal health care mandate that will result in hidden taxes for Wisconsin families, increased health care costs and insurance premiums, and more uncertainty in the private sector,” the governor said in a statement at the time.

Johnson’s resolution “disapproves and nullifies” the tax credit rule, attached to a law that, the senator says, a debt-ridden U.S. government cannot afford.

“Certainly our history shows us that once an entitlement is up in operation, the federal government is not particularly effective in stopping that entitlement,” he told Wisconsin Reporter.

More so, Johnson aims to slow down the implementation of the health care law, at least its centerpiece provision, that remains unpopular with a majority of Americans. A New York Times/CBS News poll found 61 percent of respondents want Congress to repeal the individual mandate or the entire law.

The poll, conducted in mid-August, surveyed 1,241 likely voters in Florida, 1,253 likely voters in Ohio and 1,190 likely voters in Wisconsin. The margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points.

Johnson said the odds on total repeal are long, a move that would require a victory by GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney and his Wisconsin running mate U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan, and a sweeping victory in the Senate.

“So we have to use these half measures,” he said of his resolution. “Unfortunately, that’s what have to resort to now.”

With a $16 trillion debt and a lot of concern about the eventual costs of insuring tens of millions of uninsured, Johnson said the goal is to try to “prevent as many Americans as possible to getting addicted to the health care law.” Halting the IRS rule would, at the very least, stall the taxpayer’s bill, he said.

IRS Deputy Commissioner Steven Miller, however, assured members of the subcommittee of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee in the Republican-controlled U.S. House that the agency does have the authority to set policy.

Outgoing Wisconsin Democratic U.S. Sen. Herb Kohl was direct about his opposition to Johnson’s resolution.

“It is not a resolution that Sen. Kohl would support,” said Kohl communications director Lynn Becker in an email to Wisconsin Reporter.

U.S. Rep. Ron Kind, D-District 3, told Wisconsin Reporter, “I’ve never seen so many individuals in a major political party work so hard to make sure more people are left uninsured in this country than this modern-day Republican Party.”

He claims Johnson’s resolution would result in the single largest tax increase on American families, those who would not be eligible for the tax credit, affecting many of the 54 million uninsured.

Kind, author of the Small Business Health Options Program Act, a kind of model for the health-care exchanges, said the health-care law, contrary to Republican charges, is paid for through offsets, including delivery efficiencies that the Congressional Budget Office said would help reduce the budget deficit by $1.2 trillion.

Republicans have countered that the law banks on a lot of savings a long way from being realized, and demands increased government spending.

“I know Republicans are struggling to wrap their minds around that. They’re not used to paying for things: two wars, a prescription drug plan, a tax cut. It’s hard for them to grasp the prospect of pay-as-you-go,” Kind said.

“(Johnson’s resolution) is another attempt to undermine the Affordable Care Act.”

Johnson is joined by a growing chorus of voices who support his resolution.

“On behalf of the millions of members and supporters of our organizations, we are writing to offer our strong support for S. J. Res. 48, your resolution of disapproval of the IRS premium tax credit rule,” states an online petition.

“This rule amounts to an illegitimate backdoor rewrite of the president’s health care law and the imposition of an unauthorized tax on employers of up to $2,000 per worker. We therefore urge all of your colleagues to support S. J. Res. 48.”

As of late last week, Johnson said 46,000 letters and emails in support of the resolution had poured into senate offices.

He’ll need 30 senators to push the resolution to the floor, although he said he’s aiming for all 47 Republican senators signing on. Nullifying the IRS rule would take 51 votes, so he’ll need at least four Democrats to sign on.

“I’ll put my sales hat on and try to get all 47 senators, and then we’ll apply some pressure,” he said.

Johnson is facing an uphill battle.

Legislation tracking site GovTrack.us gives the resolution’s chance at enactment at 8 percent, noting just 19 percent of all Senate joint resolutions in 2009-10 were enacted or passed.

Contact Kittle at [email protected]


  • Mark Sproul

    I just seen Mitt Romney grinning from ear to ear about the death of Americans in Libya like this is a feather in his cap just shows you how low he will go Now for My comment on this – The Republicans make sure they have the best health insurance in the world for themselves and their families and the same people that help pay for their health insurance and then have to go without for their selves and their children and getting worse every day because walker will not step up to the plate and do his job how DISCOSTING

  • I am so scared….In plain English, What does that mean for those of us who are disabled, and who are unable to work, or Unable to pay healthcare insurance.

    I have Family members and friends I worry about everyday ,besides myself ,that need health care and cannot afford to go to the Doctor or even et prescriptions that may be used to let them go on with everyday life.

    I as a disabled citizen, need to know what is going to happen to us. What so we need to prepare for? What does this mean for my spouse who is working and has NO insurance benefits?

    Very Concerned!

    Kathy B.

  • Ralph Leistden

    It’s a great resolution, hopefully enough REAL LEADERS will have the guts to support this effort to rid our great country of the awful movement to subvert our country to socialism. Hurrah for SEN Johnson, from the great state of Wisconsin.


    Mr. Sproul

    Repbulicans make sure they have the best health care plans for themselve?? What does them mean?

    All Congressional members are under the same plan as the rest of the governments employees from the desk jockey to the Speakeer of the house, they have no special healthcare plan for themselves.

    You need to do some research before you make these kind of unsupported statements. Since 1984 Congress pays Social Security, has the same retirement plan that all other governement employees have with the same restrictions.

    Wake up All is not so rosy on the Democratic side of the fence and the road to Socialism.