Bill Clinton lobbies for Hawaii studio tax credit bill

By   /   February 11, 2011  /   News  /   1 Comment

BY MALIA ZIMMERMAN — Motion picture industry giants Relativity Media LLC and Shangri-La Industries recruited Bill Clinton to push for tax credits to build studios on Maui and Oahu. But a critic says breaks just help “the rich get richer.”

Clinton who has financial ties to both companies, sent a letter this week to lawmakers asking them to support HB 1551 and SB 1550. "The Shangri-La/Relativity commitment to build the most environmentally friendly stages in existence, coupled with the economic benefits of this bill and Hawaii's timeless appeal, will make Hawaii the most attractive place in the world to shoot a film," Clinton writes.
 
The legislation would cost the state an estimated $46.3 million in lost revenues, according to the state tax department, by boosting the film production tax credit on Oahu by 35 percent (from 15 percent) and 40 percent (from 20 percent) on the neighbor islands.
 
Additional tax credits would be driven by new infrastructure and productions utilizing animated special effects, while the companies could benefit from hotel room tax exemptions, otherwise known as the Transit Accommodation Tax, if their productions require more than one month of filming. They could also rack up rebates if they offer training programs.
 
Relativity CEO Ryan Kavanaugh and Clinton pledge big gains for the state of Hawaii if the bill passes, estimating television productions and 20 additional movies will be filmed here.
 
When industry executives pulled up to the capitol in black limousines yesterday, they briefly sent Democratic lawmakers, who thought Clinton was there to testify in person, into a tizzy.
 
But Kavanaugh is a heavyweight in his own right. Relativity Media reported $2 billion in revenue last year, with adjusted earnings four to five times greater than in 2009. “Relativity has established itself as the leading independent financier and producer of the highest profile, commercial films with A-list talent,” its site says.
 
Kavanaugh’s company, which produced top grossing movies such as “The Fighter” at $320 million and “Robin Hood” at $311 million, often works in partnerships with industry giants Lions Gate Entertainment, Sony Pictures and Universal Studios.
 
Backed by private equity investor Elliott Management, and working with such notable Democratic political figures as James Carville, the Relativity CEO said last year that it is preparing for a possible public offering of stock. It also purchased the distribution and marketing arm of Overture Films from Liberty Media Corp., last July.
 
Industry reports say the film company plans to release 30 movies this year, including 15 to 18 movies of its own and another eight to 12 with NBC’s Universal Pictures and Sony Pictures. One of the movies announced is a feature film based on Michael Drosnin's “The Bible Code” to be released in 2012.
 
As to Clinton, he has good reason to become one of the state’s most famous informal lobbyists. Celebrity web sites report Clinton may become a film star himself beginning with a cameo appearance in the upcoming Relativity Media comedy “The Hangover: Part 2.”
 
Besides being featured on the big screen, the William Jefferson Clinton Foundation has been a beneficiary of multi-million contributions from motion picture giants, including Shangri-La founder Steve Bing, who contributed between $10 million and $25 million. Clinton serves on the Shangri-La advisory board.
 
Relativity partner Lions Gate also has a connection to Clinton. Its founder, Frank Giustra, a Canadian business executive who has investments in the mining and motion picture industries, donated $30.1 million to the Clinton Foundation. He also co-chaired the 2006 Global Leadership Awards dinner in New York where Clinton was honored.
 
Another financial tie to a Relativity partner, The Center for Responsive Politics, reports in 1999 that Clinton’s legal defense fund was partially financed by Universal Studios Chairman Emeritus Lew R. Wasserman. Deemed a “titan of Hollywood,” and the “godfather of the film industry,” Wasserman was honored for promoting civil rights before he died in 2002.
 
Lowell Kalapa, president of the Tax Foundation of Hawaii, isn’t shocked or awed by the film giants’ proposals or celebrity endorsers.
 
He says many national studies show that film tax credits don’t pay for themselves, rather a handful of people “walk off with the bacon.”
 
He says these tax credits would benefit a small number, while taking money from important educational and social service programs. “The cost is really born by residents,” he says. “Meanwhile the rich get richer.”
 
Kalapa says while the film industry claims to provide jobs, they are just temporary jobs that don’t have a longer term gain for Hawaii’s job market or its economy. “This is not a beneficial mechanism to attract economic development,” he says. “Instead of getting ga-ga and awed because stars are involved, we need to step back and see what this proposal means for Hawaii’s resources.”
 
The key to attracting more business to Hawaii – even film business – is not subsidies, rather it is a stronger business climate that is more friendly for all businesses, not just those that get subsidies and rebates, and a tax burden that is shared equally by all businesses.
 
HB 1551, introduced by Democratic Reps. Tom Brower, Angus McKelvey and Gilbert Keith Agaran, was already heard in the Economic Revitalization and Business committee on Thursday, however, decision-making was postponed until February 15.
 
Introduced by Senate Vice President Donna Mercado Kim, D-Kalihi, the companion bill will be heard by Economic Development and Technology and Tourism committees Monday at 1:30 p.m. in conference room 016.
 
Malia Zimmerman is an investigative reporter for http://www.HawaiiReporter.com

Click here to LEARN HOW TO STEAL OUR STUFF!

  • Anybody who hires that genocidal war criminal should be shunned by decent people.

    If Bill Clinton had faced a trail conducted in the way that the Nuremberg trials were he would certainly have been hung. He went to war against Yugoslavia to support the KLA “freedom fighters” but in fact it was to distract a gullible public from Monica. He knew at the time that there was no Yugoslav genocide going on (the British Parliament had been told the same & if British intelligence know something American does too). He knew the KLA Moslem terrorists he was bombing hospitals to help were actually gangsters, drug lords, sex slavers & organleggers who had been dissecting babies & had been hired, organised & armed by NATO for the purpose of genocide.

    When NATO occupied Kosovo appointed the KLA as “police” & sent them to commit mass murder, ethnic cleansing, the kidnap of schoolgirls to sell to brothels across the western world & the dissection, while still alive, of thousands of people to provide organs for western hospitals.

    All of this was known by those in charge at the time, though lied about in exactly the same way the Nazis lied about “resettling” Jews. It has now come out – “We discovered that these things were known by intelligence services from the different countries,” he said. “It was known by police services. It was known by numerous people who, in private, would say ‘Yes we know, but for political reasons we made the choice or we have the duty to remain silent.'”
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/kosovo/8211605/Blairs-Kosovo-triumph-turns-sour.html

    The leader of the alliance to whom this “duty” to support genocide was owed, was Clinton. He is personally guilty of war crimes numerically less than Hitler’s but even more obscene.

    If the law is to be of any value people against whom there is clear evidence of mass murder should be brought to trial irrespective of political connections.