Home  >  Wisconsin  >  Madison business exec on city’s politics policy: ‘It’s none of their damn business’

Madison business exec on city’s politics policy: ‘It’s none of their damn business’

By   /   June 18, 2013  /   8 Comments

Update: The Madison Common Council on Tuesday turned back Mayor Paul Soglin’s measure that would have required businesses bidding on city contracts to report their political contributions. The vote was 11-to-9, according to the Wisconsin State Journal.

By M.D. Kittle | Wisconsin Reporter

MADISON — Badger Welding Supplies Inc. has called Madison home since the early days of World War II.

The supplier grew up in what once was a heavy manufacturing part of town, on the near east side, and has been family owned since 1955.

When you’ve been around as long as Badger Welding, you must be doing something right. And you don’t stay for 70-plus years without liking where you are.

REGULATION MAD: Madison has accrued a reputation as a heavy regulation town. Business advocates say the liberal city isn’t doing itself any favors with an ordinance that would demand businesses looking to do business with the city to disclose their political activity.

But Scott Griskavich, president of  the business, says he’s not happy with an ordinance that would have individuals and businesses disclose their private political activity if they want to do business with the city.

Griskavich has a message for Mayor Paul Soglin and the proponents of the policy:

“That’s none of their damn business,” he told Wisconsin Reporter on Tuesday afternoon, hours before the Common Council was expected to act on the ordinance. “If I have to disclose anything like that before I make a sale to the city of Madison they can buy it somewhere else.”

“We just kind of roll with the punches, but this one kind of hit us in the chin,” the businessman said.

Business in Madison has taken its share of punches, some say, in a city exploding with opportunity but dogged by a reputation as a heavy regulation town moved by local government with an adversarial relationship with business.

Earlier this year, a survey by Governing magazine ranked Madison 21st on a list of the most – and least – friendly places to do business. Not horrible out of 57 metros.  The capital city fared well in categories such as “ease of starting a business” (eighth) and “ease of hiring” (twelfth).

Madison performed dreadfully, however,  in “overall regulatory friendliness,” ranking 51st. Some of the nation’s larger metropolitan areas were not included in the survey, according to Governing. The city’s worst ranking was in “friendliness of employment, labor and hiring regulations, where it finished 54th. It didn’t test much better in environmental regulations, ranking 52nd and finishing 51st in zoning regulations.

Austin, Texas topped the  ranking, followed by Virginia Beach, Va., Houston, Colorado Springs, Colo., and San Antonio rounding out the top five.

Milwaukee, coincidentally, ranked 33rd in overall business friendliness, finishing toward the lower middle of the list in most categories.

“It is critical to the economic health of every city and state to create an entrepreneur-friendly environment,” Dane Stangler, director of Research and Policy at the Kauffman Foundation, which conducted the survey in partnership with Thumbtack.com. “Policymakers put themselves in the best position to encourage sustainable growth and long-term prosperity by listening to the voices of small business owners themselves.”

Attitude adjustment?

On this, the 50th anniversary of National Small Business Week, Zach Brandon said Madison is a hive of entrepreneurial activity, but in the past city government has been less than welcoming.

“Historically it has been challenge. Businesses have been frustrated with government and the attitude toward local businesses,” said Brandon, president of the Greater Madison Chamber of Commerce.

Brandon, who served as secretary of the old state Department of Commerce under former Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle, said the most common theme he hears from chamber member businesses regards a general city government “attitude of not understanding and valuing the role business plays in providing the resources of how government operates, which is tax revenue.”

The chamber chief says he is a walking testimonial of the strength of Madison’s business allure. He moved his company to the city by the lakes 15 years ago, drawn by the region’s quality of life and opportunities for growth. It was after he arrived that he said he encountered resistance from local government.

He says things are changing, with local leaders experiencing an “epiphany,” realizing that business, not merely an emphasis on the city’s government and university bases, is the critical engine required to drive Madison’s economic engine.

Carole Schaeffer, president of Schaeffer Consulting and executive director of Smart Growth Greater Madison, which represents real estate developers in the area, said Madison is a mixed bag of economic opportunity and challenges. While the city has updated its zoning code for the first time in nearly 50 years and there have been marked improvements in how local government deals with development, Schaeffer said developers still constantly confront overlapping jurisdictions with “plans piled on top of each other.” The result has been regulatory stumbling blocks, territorialism and, at worst, agency and board confusion over planning and development policies.

‘Distraction’

The controversial political activity ordinance won’t do any favors for a liberal city viewed with a jaundiced eye by some entrepreneurs, such as Andrew Disch, a spokesman for the Madison Area Builders Association, which represents some 600 members.

“The city contracting process is already overly burdensome to the typical small-business owner,” Disch said, citing excessive paperwork and questionnaires required. “This is just one more hurdle. A local business that can provide services in a quality and cost-efficient manner might choose not to do that in the future.”

Under the proposal, any business or individual who owns more than 10 percent of a business that wins a city contract worth $25,000 or more would be required to divulge contributions to super PACs and 501(c)(4) organizations, which include arms of labor unions, corporations and other “social welfare organizations” that may engage in some political advocacy.

The ordinance states the political disclosure cannot be used as a standard for awarding business contracts.

But Alderman Scott Resnick told Politifact Wisconsin that the Common Council would use the information on donations made to groups supporting conservatives when evaluating future city contracts.

“So we want to know if you were putting money towards that before we sign another contract with you,” he told Politifact. “This would be one more data set that will be used to make decisions.”

Soglin defended the measure in a Wisconsin Reporter story this week.

“This isn’t about selling hamburgers to the city, it’s about political donations — donations that are designed to influence the outcome of elections. It’s about the public’s right to know,” the mayor said.

Christopher Harrison, chief executive or founder Great Lakes SAN, a start-up provider of managed data storage, said he supports the ordinance.

“I believe anyone doing work with the government should have full disclosure, what are their positions and where they stand with contributions,” said Harrison, who described his two-employee firm is “as close to getting off the ground as you can be.” He sees Madison as a business friendly community, and he doesn’t believe the political ordinance would hinder business activity.

The Madison chamber came out in unanimous opposition to the ordinance. Brandon said more than anything, it’s a distraction.

“This sends the wrong message that, in Madison, your politics matter when it comes to our procurement process,” he said. It’s energy poorly spent, the business advocate added.

Schaeffer said the policy does nothing more than create an adversarial climate within a city government that has made improvements in recent years in reaching out to the business community.

“I’m not certain what it’s trying to accomplish, other than shame or fear people into not making donations to a group,” she said.

Contact Kittle at mkittle@wisconsinreporter.com

Click here to LEARN HOW TO STEAL OUR STUFF!

M.D. Kittle is national First Amendment reporter at Watchdog.org. Contact him at mkittle@watchdog.org.

  • Tax Payer USN

    Here is the rest of the story if you got a Demarcate lead Council and a Republican Donator contractor bids and a Demarcate donator bids who do you think their going to choose. It works both ways, their supposed to be sealed Bids but I think anybody older than a fifth grader knows how Government works in reality.

  • http://www.wisconsinfairtax.org/ Axe The Lobbyist

    Now I remember why I left Madison. I was a big fan of Soglins back when I was a dope smoking uninformed freshman. If anyone thinks that disclosing this information won’t affect how bids are awarded for government contracts I know where you can get your stash. You’re high!

  • Paul

    Brandon was Secretary?

  • Franseenit

    Politics – political choices, like your vote must be kept confidential unless the citizen/voter chooses to make their leanings and activities public. The most egregious thing that the republicans did was to make the recall signatures public. They had no right to do so. They had no business putting in online either. That in my opinion is a blatant crime. Corporate people have no right to go to the parking lot either to check if you have bumper stickers on your car supporting anyone against your political stance. My god, what has this country come to?

  • Luonne Dumak

    Dear Franseenit,
    It seems like you don’t have a clue about what you are talking about. First and foremost the Republicans DID Not put the names on the web site. It was done by many Liberty loving people around this once great Country. Second, these documents are Public property, you do know about FOIA or maybe you don’t. Those signatures are Government documents which are open to the PUBLIC. If you don’t want your name known to the public, don’t sign anything. I must say as a Conservative I love watching all the idiot signers squirm. At least Republicans don’t key cars, give nasty hand signs and do other damage to property because of bumper stickers on cars. We just laugh at the loser idiots.

  • jeb

    Supreme Court always upholds greater disclosure. The point is, political donations can influence politicians and create problems in transparency and can affect the perception of fraud. If things are disclosed and a Democrat politician refuses to use a Republican supporting business, it would all be public knowledge. If a Democrat supported a bid to a financial supporter and the financial support could be kept secret, we have fraud, waste and abuse. If you want to disclose nothing, do t use your business as a front for your personal political speech. This idea is not crushing, it is something Scalia and Ginsberg would support.

  • Luonne Dumak

    The signatures were already on the GAB website. They are PUBLIC documents. What don’t you understand about the word Public. If you are proud of what you do, why do you need to hide the fact of your actions? Stupid is as stupid does and you are stupid.

  • Luonne Dumak

    If you park in a Public parking lot anyone can park in the lot and as they are walking thru they can look at any cars they want. If it is a private lot the owner or business has a right to walk thru the lot and check to see if there are cars or other vehicles that are illegally parked there. Don’t put stickers on your car if you don’t want to know want anyone to know what kind of people you support. Are you saying that the GAB is committing a crime by being transparent. Didn’t Obumber say he was going to run the most transparent administration? HAHA!! Your opinion is worthless.

x

Join other concerned citizens who get the latest updates from Watchdog.org on government waste, fraud, or abuse.


Read stories like:

Enter your email and stay on top of the news that matters.