<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Watchdog News &#187; New Hampshire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watchdog.org/tag/new-hampshire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watchdog.org</link>
	<description>The Government Watchdog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:55:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>BOSSE: Mother Nature need more markets</title>
		<link>http://watchdog.org/14593/commentary-mother-nature-need-more-markets/</link>
		<comments>http://watchdog.org/14593/commentary-mother-nature-need-more-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 00:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Watchdog Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WatchBlog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hampshire Watchdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH Watchdog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdog.org/?p=14593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Grant Bosse &#124; New Hampshire Watchdog
Happy Earth Day. It was actually at the first Earth Day back in 1970 that the environmental movement went wrong.

The late-U.S. Sen. Edmund Muskie drafted a Clean Air Act to include strict air quality performance standards. Ralph Nader convinced Muskie that he was being soft of polluters, and shifted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNoSpacing">By Grant Bosse | New Hampshire Watchdog</p>
<div>Happy Earth Day. It was actually at the first Earth Day back in 1970 that the environmental movement went wrong.<a href="http://watchdog.org/files/2012/04/96421568.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-15018" title="Background of sky and grass" src="http://watchdog.org/files/2012/04/96421568-300x183.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="183" /></a></div>
<p><span id="more-14593"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">The late-U.S. Sen. Edmund Muskie drafted a Clean Air Act to include strict air quality performance standards. Ralph Nader convinced Muskie that he was being soft of polluters, and shifted the law’s focus from environmental outcomes to command-and-control technology standards. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act and Endangered Species Act soon followed.  For the past four decades, we stopped caring about environmental outcomes while federal regulators have micromanaged industrial processes.</p>
<div>The result is a system that imposes huge compliance costs on the American people while doing a mediocre job of cleaning our air and water.</div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>Read the full story <a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/10424/mother-nature-needs-more-markets/">NewHampshireWatchdog.org</a>.</strong></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchdog.org/14593/commentary-mother-nature-need-more-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A drop less freedom in New Hampshire</title>
		<link>http://watchdog.org/14419/a-drop-less-freedom-in-new-hampshire/</link>
		<comments>http://watchdog.org/14419/a-drop-less-freedom-in-new-hampshire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WatchBlog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hampshire Watchdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH Watchdog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdog.org/?p=14419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing seems to anger the modern environmentalist more than an empty plastic water bottle. You’d think our otherwise empty landfills were overflowing with Poland Spring and Dasani litter, and you might as well strangle a sea turtle with your bare hands as open an Aquafina.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Grant Bosse | New Hampshire Watchdog</p>
<p><strong>CONCORD </strong>&#8211; Nothing seems to anger the modern environmentalist more than an empty plastic water bottle. You’d think our otherwise empty landfills were overflowing with Poland Spring and Dasani litter, and you might as well strangle a sea turtle with your bare hands as open an Aquafina.<a href="http://watchdog.org/files/2012/04/Water-bottle.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-14420 alignright" title="rbrb_3638" src="http://watchdog.org/files/2012/04/Water-bottle.jpg" alt="" width="146" height="219" /></a></p>
<p>This week, Phillips Exeter Academy joined the anti-bottled water movement, blocking its sale on campus. PEA joins Harvard, UVM, and growing list of other cloistered campuses in taking a symbolic stand against a product that more than half of all Americans buy.</p>
<p>According to the Union Leader, UNH’s Ecosystem Task Force has installed 40 hydration stations across campus, while Dartmouth officials are trying to reduce student demand for bottled water. UC Berkeley opted against a ban after concluding that students would simply buy iced tea and soda if they couldn’t buy bottled water.</p>
<p>According to the ban-the-bottle campaign, buying a clean, cold bottle of water whenever you want is a wasteful extravagance. But so is most of modern life. We don’t need most of our modern conveniences any more than we need a beverage we could have brought from home.</p>
<p>Bottled water opponents miss the point. Sure, we can get the water for almost nothing, but we’re not really buying the water. We’re buying the bottle. We’re paying someone else to store and refrigerate our water, which we can pick up when we’re thirsty. We’re purchasing a portable and disposable container instead of worrying about packing, cleaning, and refilling it.</p>
<p>Are plastic water bottles really that bad for the planet? Aren’t they dwarfed by thousands of other beverages containers and food packages? Are Vitamin Water, Sprite, and Mountain Dew drinkers just as irresponsible in their choices? How many gallons of water and tons of coal do we use washing Nalgene bottles?</p>
<p>According to the ban-the-bottle campaign, non-recycled water bottles account for three billions pounds of solid waste each year, which sounds like a lot. The EPA calculates that the U.S. generates 254 million tons of solid waste each year, 12% of which is plastic. If every plastic water bottle in the country ceased to exist, we’d cut the amount of plastic waste by less than ½ of 1%. Casting water bottles as an unmitigated ecological menace is just silly. <strong><a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/10386/a-drop-less-freedom/" target="_blank">Continue reading at New Hampshire Watchdog.</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchdog.org/14419/a-drop-less-freedom-in-new-hampshire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>School Choice Roundup in New Hampshire</title>
		<link>http://watchdog.org/14067/school-choice-roundup-in-new-hampshire/</link>
		<comments>http://watchdog.org/14067/school-choice-roundup-in-new-hampshire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WatchBlog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hampshire Watchdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH Watchdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdog.org/?p=14067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Grant Bosse &#124; New Hampshire Watchdog

Yesterday, the New Hampshire Senate approved SB 372, the School Choice Scholarship Act, by a vote of 15-9. The Josiah Bartlett Center has been instrumental in researching scholarship tax credit programs in other states, led by Research Fellow Jason Bedrick and his comprehensive report,Choosing to Learn.
Union Leader- Senate approves tax [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Grant Bosse | <a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/10234/school-choice-roundup/" target="_blank">New Hampshire Watchdog</a></p>
<div>
<p><a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/10234/school-choice-roundup/"><img class="alignright" title="State House front" src="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/files/2011/02/State-House-front-300x213.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="213" /></a>Yesterday, the New Hampshire Senate approved SB 372, the School Choice Scholarship Act, by a vote of 15-9. The Josiah Bartlett Center has been instrumental in researching scholarship tax credit programs in other states, led by Research Fellow Jason Bedrick and his comprehensive report,<a href="http://www.jbartlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Choosing-to-Learn-2.5.pdf"><em>Choosing to Learn</em></a>.</p>
<p>Union Leader- <a href="http://www.unionleader.com/article/20120321/NEWS06/120329933"><em>Senate approves tax credit for school scholarships</em></a></p>
<p>NH Public Radio- <a href="http://www.nhpr.org/post/school-choice-bill-passes-senate-despite-constitutionality-concerns"><em>School Choice Bill Passes Senate Despite Constitutionality Concerns</em></a></p>
<p>Foster’s Daily Democrat- <a href="http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120322/GJNEWS_01/703229678/-1/FOSNEWS"><em>N.H. Senate signs off on scholarships for private school students</em></a></p>
<p>Portsmouth Herald- <a href="http://www.seacoastonline.com/articles/20120322-NEWS-203220426"><em>N.H. Senate panel OKs tax credits for student scholarships</em></a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchdog.org/14067/school-choice-roundup-in-new-hampshire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Hampshire drop out rate jumped in 2011</title>
		<link>http://watchdog.org/13856/new-hampshire-drop-out-rate-jumped-in-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://watchdog.org/13856/new-hampshire-drop-out-rate-jumped-in-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 14:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drop out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drop out rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hampshire Watchdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH Watchdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdog.org/?p=13856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CONCORD -- New Hampshire’s high school drop out rate climbed by over 20% last year, but is still the second lowest its ever been. The number of students who dropped out increased from 628 in 2009-2010 to 751 last year, causing the dropout rate to jump from 0.97% to 1.19%. That level is still well below the 2.5% annual drop out rate in New Hampshire before the Legislature increased the minimum drop out age to 18.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Grant Bosse | New Hampshire Watchdog</p>
<div>
<p><strong>CONCORD</strong> &#8212; New Hampshire’s high school drop out rate climbed by over 20% last year, but is still the second lowest its ever been. The number of students who dropped out increased from 628 in 2009-2010 to 751 last year, causing the dropout rate to jump from 0.97% to 1.19%. That level is still well below the 2.5% annual drop out rate in New Hampshire before the Legislature increased the minimum drop out age to 18.</p>
<p>Four years ago, the New Hampshire Department of Education changed the way it calculates the drop out rate. Earlier statistics included students who left high school, but went on to complete a GED or enroll in college courses. The new rate does not include these students. The Josiah Bartlett Center calculates that under the old formula, New Hampshire’s drop out rate would have been 1.86% in 2010-2011, up from 1.59% last year.</p>
<p><a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/files/2012/03/Drop-Out-Blackboard1.jpg"><img title="Drop Out Blackboard" src="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/files/2012/03/Drop-Out-Blackboard1.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="462" /></a></p>
<p>Those rates include only those students who drop out of high school in any single school year. The New England Secondary School Consortium (NESSC) tracks dropout rates in other New England states based on the cumulative percentage of students entering ninth grade who fail to graduate. New Hampshire began reporting the NESSC percentages last year. While the 2010-2011 annual dropout rate increased, the cumulative dropout rate for the Class of 2011 was actually more than full percent lower than the Class of 2010, 3.3% compared to 4.44%.</p>
<p>In June 2007, the Legislature increased the minimum age at which a student could leave school to 18, and lowering the drop out rate has been a major priority for Governor John Lynch. In March 2011, the New Hampshire voted to lower the drop out age to 16. The bill died in the Senate. The Class of 2011 was the first to be enrolled in high school for four years under the higher drop out age.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/10135/nh-drop-out-rate-jumped-in-2011/" target="_blank">Continue Reading&#8230;</a></strong></p>
</div>
<div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchdog.org/13856/new-hampshire-drop-out-rate-jumped-in-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some NH Commissioners keep state cars, some lose them</title>
		<link>http://watchdog.org/12613/some-nh-commissioners-keep-state-cars-some-lose-them/</link>
		<comments>http://watchdog.org/12613/some-nh-commissioners-keep-state-cars-some-lose-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hampshire Watchdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH Watchdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state cars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdog.org/?p=12613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Grant Bosse &#124; New Hampshire Watchdog

CONCORD &#8211; New Hampshire is somewhat inconsistent on which top officials drive government cars. Following a year long review on Non-Business Use of state vehicles, some Commissioners were allowed to keep taking their state vehicles home at night while other were asked to turn in their keys. Now lawmakers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Grant Bosse | New Hampshire Watchdog</p>
<div>
<p><a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/files/2011/12/DOT-Truck.jpg"><img class="alignright" title="DOT Truck" src="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/files/2011/12/DOT-Truck-300x224.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="224" /></a><strong>CONCORD </strong>&#8211; New Hampshire is somewhat inconsistent on which top officials drive government cars. Following a year long review on Non-Business Use of state vehicles, some Commissioners were allowed to keep taking their state vehicles home at night while other were asked to turn in their keys. Now lawmakers are looking at ways to improve management of the state’s motor vehicle fleet, and could ask state employees to reimburse taxpayers for every mile they drive off the clock.</p>
<p><strong>FLEET WEEK</strong><br />
Monday- <a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/9545/nh-state-workers-drive-1-5-million-personal-miles-a-year/">NH state workers drive 1.5 million personal miles a year</a><br />
Tuesday- <a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/9616/nh-takes-the-keys-from-liquor-commissioners/">NH takes the keys from Liquor Commissioners</a><br />
Wednesday- <a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/9635/dred-commissioner-defends-giving-cannon-gm-company-car/">DRED Commissioner defends giving Cannon GM “Company Car”</a><br />
Thursday- <a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/9671/nh-dot-claims-employees-save-money-by-taking-home-state-cars/">NH DOT claims employees save money by taking home state cars</a></p>
<p>According to a report presented to the Legislative Fiscal Committee this month by the Department of Administrative Services, 233 state vehicles accumulated more than 15% of their miles for Non-Business Use last year, totaling more than 1.5 million miles. Most of those miles were from employees in the Department of Transportation driving directly to and from job sites in the field. DOT persuaded state officials reviewing the use of state cars that letting these employees commute in state cars improved efficiency and was worth the cost in higher gas bills and automotive maintenance.</p>
<p>But not all those miles were from civil engineers and bridge inspectors. Several top bureaucrats also commute on the taxpayers’ dime, according to the DAS report. As we reported earlier this week, all three of <a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/9616/nh-takes-the-keys-from-liquor-commissioners/">New Hampshire’s Liquor Commissioners</a> were asked to return their state vehicles after racking up significant miles outside of official business. But DRED <a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/9635/dred-commissioner-defends-giving-cannon-gm-company-car/">Commissioner George Bald</a> was allowed to keep his state car, which he drives to and from the office.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/9699/some-nh-commissioners-keep-state-cars-some-lose-them/" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;.</a></strong></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchdog.org/12613/some-nh-commissioners-keep-state-cars-some-lose-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NH DOT claims employees save money by taking home state cars</title>
		<link>http://watchdog.org/12598/nh-dot-claims-employees-save-money-by-taking-home-state-cars/</link>
		<comments>http://watchdog.org/12598/nh-dot-claims-employees-save-money-by-taking-home-state-cars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hampshire Watchdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH Watchdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdog.org/?p=12598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Grant Bosse &#124; New Hampshire Watchdog

CONCORD &#8211; Of the 1.5 million miles that New Hampshire employees drove state cars for Non-Business Use last year, 1.1 million were in the Department of Transportation. The agency responsible for the Granite State’s roads and bridges has the largest number of vehicles in the state’s fleet, and by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Grant Bosse | New Hampshire Watchdog</p>
<p><a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/files/2011/12/DOT-Building.jpg"><img class="alignright" title="DOT Building" src="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/files/2011/12/DOT-Building-300x224.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="224" /></a></p>
<p><strong>CONCORD </strong>&#8211; Of the 1.5 million miles that New Hampshire employees drove state cars for Non-Business Use last year, 1.1 million were in the Department of Transportation. The agency responsible for the Granite State’s roads and bridges has the largest number of vehicles in the state’s fleet, and by far the most of those cars and trucks outside of official business. But DOT officials insist that letting workers take state vehicles home at night can ultimately save taxpayers money.</p>
<p>DOT has 606 cars and trucks that fall under SB 402, a law passed last year to cut down on state vehicle expenses. Under the law, agencies must now track Non-Business Use of vehicles under 10,000 pounds, and turn in the keys to any vehicles with more than 15% Non-Business Use unless they can justify its continued use to a panel of state officials led by Department of Administrative Services Commissioner Linda Hodgdon. A recent DAS report found that 179 DOT vehicles tripped the 15% NBU threshold, along with 54 cars from across all other New Hampshire departments.</p>
<p><strong>FLEET WEEK</strong><br />
Monday- <a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/9545/nh-state-workers-drive-1-5-million-personal-miles-a-year/">NH state workers drive 1.5 million personal miles a year</a><br />
Tuesday- <a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/9616/nh-takes-the-keys-from-liquor-commissioners/">NH takes the keys from Liquor Commissioners</a><br />
Wednesday- <a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/9635/dred-commissioner-defends-giving-cannon-gm-company-car/">DRED Commissioner defends giving Cannon GM “Company Car”</a></p>
<p>30% of DOT vehicles were used extensively outside of business travel, compared to just 4% for all other vehicles. Fish and Game and Health and Human Services each had only one car in the report despite each having over 100 vehicles in their departments. DAS calculates that the average state car costs $.33 per mile to operate, putting the total tab for employees driving their DOT vehicles to and from work at $384,000. But the same DAS estimates also take into account how much the state would have paid to reimburse employees for official travel if they had not had access to state cars. Those savings drop the total cost of Non-Business Use within DOT to just over $100,000 in Fiscal Year 2011.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/9671/nh-dot-claims-employees-save-money-by-taking-home-state-cars/" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchdog.org/12598/nh-dot-claims-employees-save-money-by-taking-home-state-cars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NH DRED Commissioner defends giving Cannon GM “Company Car”</title>
		<link>http://watchdog.org/12586/nh-dred-commissioner-defends-giving-cannon-gm-%e2%80%9ccompany-car%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://watchdog.org/12586/nh-dred-commissioner-defends-giving-cannon-gm-%e2%80%9ccompany-car%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commissioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Resources and Economic Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hampshire Watchdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH Watchdog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdog.org/?p=12586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Grant Bosse &#124; New Hampshire

CONCORD &#8212; Commissioner George Bald is satisfied that no one in his department is abusing the privilege of driving state-owned vehicles, even if he was a little sloppy in keeping track of his own mileage. The head of the Department of Resources and Economic Development defends his decision to let [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Grant Bosse | New Hampshire</p>
<div>
<p><a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/files/2011/12/Cannon-Logo.jpg"><img class="alignright" title="Cannon Logo" src="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/files/2011/12/Cannon-Logo-300x202.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="202" /></a><strong>CONCORD</strong> &#8212; Commissioner George Bald is satisfied that no one in his department is abusing the privilege of driving state-owned vehicles, even if he was a little sloppy in keeping track of his own mileage. The head of the Department of Resources and Economic Development defends his decision to let the General Manager of Cannon Mountain take home a “company car” every night, putting more than 18,000 personal miles on the vehicle in Fiscal Year 2011.</p>
<p><strong>FLEET WEEK</strong><br />
Monday- <a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/9545/nh-state-workers-drive-1-5-million-personal-miles-a-year/">NH state workers drive 1.5 million personal miles a year</a><br />
Tuesday- <a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/9616/nh-takes-the-keys-from-liquor-commissioners/">NH takes the keys from Liquor Commissioners</a></p>
<p>“There are a lot of requirements that people have to meet with different companies and travel the district. I don’t feel there is any waste going on with people in DRED using state vehicles,” Bald tells New Hampshire Watchdog. “And if they take them home, it is because it was going to be less expensive than for them to be driving to Concord to pick up the vehicle.”</p>
<p>DRED had eleven of its 168 state vehicles show up on a recent report detailing cars and trucks with more than 15% of their miles for Non-Business Use last year. A new state law, SB 402, requires that agencies track that mileage more carefully and redistribute vehicles above that threshold unless a they receive a waiver to let employees keep their state cars. Ten of those eleven vehicles received waivers, including Bald’s own car.</p>
<p>Bald drives a 2006 Chevrolet Impala LS, and last year drove it 25,980 miles, according to a report submitted by Administrative Services Commissioner Linda Hodgdon to the Legislative Fiscal Committee earlier this month. Bald says he drives the car to and from work.</p>
<p>“I live in Somersworth, but I generally work out of the Concord office. I do take it home every night. Sometimes I’m going up to Colebrook or Berlin from here,” Bald explains. “I could have a meeting in Portsmouth in the morning, and Keene in the afternoon.”</p>
<p>State rules, and federal tax guidelines, treat a public employee’s commute as Non-Business Use. The distance between home and the office does not count as official travel. And while Bald submitted details mileage reports for ten of his department’s vehicles, he could not precisely account for his own mileage.</p>
<p>“I didn’t keep the records as well as other people have,” Bald readily admits. “Whenever I gas up, I note the mileage, but I wasn’t as good at keeping the mileage between various trips.”</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/9635/dred-commissioner-defends-giving-cannon-gm-company-car/" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></strong></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchdog.org/12586/nh-dred-commissioner-defends-giving-cannon-gm-%e2%80%9ccompany-car%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NH state workers drive 1.5 million personal miles a year</title>
		<link>http://watchdog.org/12507/nh-state-workers-drive-1-5-million-personal-miles-a-year/</link>
		<comments>http://watchdog.org/12507/nh-state-workers-drive-1-5-million-personal-miles-a-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hampshire Watchdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH Watchdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publiv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdog.org/?p=12507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Grant Bosse &#124; New Hampshire Watchdog
CONCORD &#8211; State employees drove 1.5 million miles in state vehicles for non-business use last year, according to a report presented to the Legislature by the Department of Administrative Services. Starting in Fiscal Year 2011, DAS is charged with determining how many miles each state vehicles was driven for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Grant Bosse | New Hampshire Watchdog</p>
<p><strong>CONCORD &#8211;</strong> State employees drove 1.5 million miles in state vehicles for non-business use last year, according to a report presented to the Legislature by the Department of Administrative Services. Starting in Fiscal Year 2011, DAS is charged with determining how many miles each state vehicles was driven for official and non-business use, and reporting any car or truck that had more than 15% of its miles driven off the clock.</p>
<div>
<p><a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/files/2011/12/DOT-Truck.jpg"><img class="alignright" title="DOT Truck" src="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/files/2011/12/DOT-Truck-300x224.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="224" /></a>The 233 vehicles reported to the Legislature were driven 1,504,034 miles for non-business use in FY11, and a total of 4,150,092 miles including official business. That’s enough miles to circle the Earth six times, or make three round trips to the moon. DAS calculates the state’s cost for allowing a state employee to use its vehicles at $.33 per mile, meaning that state employees cost the state $496,331 last year by using their government cars.</p>
<p>However, DAS also calculates how much it would have cost taxpayers to reimburse state employees if they had used their own cars for official business. The state reimburses official travel at $.55 per mile. So in some cases, it is cheaper to let a workers take home a state car than to reimburse them for their official travel. The 233 vehicles that tripped the 15% threshold represent 12% of the state’s fleet of passenger cars and light trucks under 10,000 pounds. The report does not include heavy construction equipment, which can be assigned to state employees but not used to commute to and from the job site. 61 of the vehicles were actually driven more for personal use that on official state business.</p>
<p>Last year, the Legislature passed <a href="http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2010/SB0402.html">Senate Bill 402</a>, which in addition to directing departments to reduce their overall in-state travel, requires that reassignment of cars that exceed 15% personal use.</p>
<p>For every vehicle that logs more than 15% Non-Business Use (NBU), a panel of state officials led by DAS Commissioner Linda Hodgden decides whether the car should be repurposed within the fleet or retained by its current employee or department. Of the 233 vehicles that tripped the 15% threshold last year, 14 were repurposed while 218 were retained. The NBU report Hodgden presented earlier this month to the Legislative Fiscal Committee states that one vehicle assigned to the Board of Pharmacy was “erroneously logged NBU”. According to the report, there are 1,884 passenger automobiles and light trucks in the state fleet.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/9545/nh-state-workers-drive-1-5-million-personal-miles-a-year/" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></strong></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchdog.org/12507/nh-state-workers-drive-1-5-million-personal-miles-a-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RGGI running $600K deficit in New Hampshire</title>
		<link>http://watchdog.org/12405/rggi-running-600k-deficit-in-new-hampshire/</link>
		<comments>http://watchdog.org/12405/rggi-running-600k-deficit-in-new-hampshire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHGERF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hampshire Watchdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH Watchdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RGGI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdog.org/?p=12405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Grant Bosse &#124; New Hampshire Watchdog

CONCORD &#8212; Plummeting demand for carbon allowances has left New Hampshire officials $600,000 short of the grants they’ve made with the state’s Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative revenues. The quarterly RGGI auctions are the sole source of revenues for the state’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Fund (GHGERF), which has pledged [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Grant Bosse | New Hampshire Watchdog</p>
<div>
<p><strong>CONCORD</strong> &#8212; Plummeting demand for carbon allowances has left New Hampshire officials $600,000 short of the grants they’ve made with the state’s Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative revenues. The quarterly RGGI auctions are the sole source of revenues for the state’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Fund (GHGERF), which has pledged more in its first two years than the RGGI program generated for the Granite State in its first three years.</p>
<p><a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/files/2011/12/RGGI-Revenues-2009-2011-page-001.jpg"><img class="alignright" title="RGGI Revenues 2009-2011-page-001" src="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/files/2011/12/RGGI-Revenues-2009-2011-page-001-300x231.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="231" /></a>When the Legislature signed New Hampshire up for RGGI in 2008 it set aside $1.2 million from the future auctions to boost the state’s existing Weatherization Program. The Legislature also diverted $3.1 million from the GHGERF in June 2010 as part of a budget balancing package put forward by Governor John Lynch to close the state’s $300 million deficit. In 2009, the Public Utilities Commission handed out $17.66 million from the GHGERF. In 2010, the PUC issued $13.4 million in grants.</p>
<p>With demand in the RGGI auction falling since 2009, New Hampshire and its nine partner states began to see less revenue from each quarterly auction. The PUC did not make any awards from the GHGERF in 2011. You can see how all of RGGI’s New Hampshire revenues were spent in the Josiah Bartlett Center’s February 2010 report, <em><a href="http://www.jbartlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/RGGI-in-New-Hampshire-The-First-Two-Years-02-15-11.pdf">RGGI in New Hampshire: The First Two Years</a></em>.</p>
<p>RGGI Inc. began offering carbon allowances for sale in September 2008. New Hampshire began its participation in the second auction, held in December 2008. The first three auctions each generated more than $4 million for the state. But <a href="http://rggi.org/docs/NH_Proceeds_by_Auction.pdf">RGGI revenues</a> have not reached that level since, topping $3 million just twice since September 2009, and bottoming out at less than half a million dollars in September 2011.</p>
<p>In the five auctions held between December 2008 and December 2009, New Hampshire realized more than $18.2 million. That was slightly more than the Weatherization set-aside and the 2009 round of GHGERF grants. As RGGI prices dropped to the preset reserve price in 2010, New Hampshire revenues fell to a little more than $10 million. The PUC and the Legislature spent $16.5 million that year. RGGI revenues dropped again in 2011, as millions of carbon allowances went unsold, even at the floor price of $1.89 per ton. New Hampshire took in just $6.5 million, not quite enough to cover its commitments from the year before.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://newhampshire.watchdog.org/9573/rggi-running-600k-deficit-in-new-hampshire/" target="_blank">Read more&#8230;</a></strong></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchdog.org/12405/rggi-running-600k-deficit-in-new-hampshire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rebuffed in Iowa, Gary Johnson concentrates on New Hampshire</title>
		<link>http://watchdog.org/10811/rebuffed-in-iowa-gary-johnson-concentrates-on-new-hampshire/</link>
		<comments>http://watchdog.org/10811/rebuffed-in-iowa-gary-johnson-concentrates-on-new-hampshire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 14:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdog.org/?p=10811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Rob Nikolewski
You won’t see Gary Johnson next Thursday (Aug. 11) at the Republican candidates’ debate in Ames, Iowa which will be nationally televised on the FOX Newschannel.
Johnson’s campaign released a statement late  Friday (Aug. 5) saying the longshot GOP presidential candidate and  former New Mexico governor will concentrate his efforts on New [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Rob Nikolewski</p>
<p>You won’t see <a href="http://www.garyjohnson2012.com/" target="_blank">Gary Johnson </a>next Thursday (Aug. 11) at the<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/fox-news-debates/index.html" target="_blank"> Republican candidates’ debate </a>in Ames, Iowa which will be nationally televised on the <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/fox-news-debates/index.html" target="_blank">FOX Newschannel</a>.</p>
<p>Johnson’s campaign<a href="http://www.garyjohnson2012.com/johnson-campaign-ames-straw-poll-not-what-we-are-about" target="_blank"> released a statement </a>late  Friday (Aug. 5) saying the longshot GOP presidential candidate and  former New Mexico governor will concentrate his efforts on New Hampshire  because the “Ames Straw poll has much more to do with organizing bus  loads of supporters than it does with ideas and solutions to our  country’s economic problems, or the even the electability of  candidates.”</p>
<p>Johnson was in danger of not getting invited to the Aug. 11 debate after he was left off the official ballot. (<a href="http://www.capitolreportnewmexico.com/?p=5497" target="_blank">Click here </a>for that story.) Johnson has been struggling to gain some attention and traction in the Republican race.</p>
<p>“The Johnson campaign is not abandoning Iowa,” the statement said,  “as only last week Governor Johnson participated for his second year in <a href="http://ragbrai.com/" target="_blank">RAGBRAI</a> [bicycle race] activities .  That, however, is a very different thing  than participating in a straw poll, months before the caucuses.”</p>
<p><a href="http://newmexico.watchdog.org/8618/rebuffed-in-iowa-gary-johnson-concentrates-on-new-hampshire/" target="_blank"><strong>Read more&#8230;</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://watchdog.org/10811/rebuffed-in-iowa-gary-johnson-concentrates-on-new-hampshire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

